228
Hear FUCKING
HEAR!
what’s insane was that these could have been released earlier, but the house ethics committee has rules that stop negative reports from being released too close to an election. (source)
as if it might be a bad thing that someone doesn’t get re-elected because they were found to have done seriously unethical things.
$20 it was the intelligence departments. They ain't about to have someone they don't know everything about tell them what to do
Anonymous or the US intelligence agencies. No wonder the sick loser quit.
Shit is going to be FIRE.
And yet, there will be no consequences and it will change nothing 🙁
Leak it for justice. The information should be public in a just society.
in a just society.
Player 3 has joined the game
Huh. So that's how Congress is leaking now. Suits me. Been waiting for years to see the evidence.
And BTW, now that the spoiled frat boy quit, who the hell is my Congressman?!
And BTW, now that the spoiled frat boy quit, who the hell is my Congressman?!
Could be you. Run for office.
I second this!
I'M fucking considering at this point. The R's last few attempts where i live were the fucking weatherman and someone who's lived out of state since the 70's.
What's the worst that could happen, we win..?
NPR mentioned the interim appointment options from DeSantis today.
It includes Laura Trump on a shortlist.
And BTW, now that the spoiled frat boy quit, who the hell is my Congressman?!
vacant house seats are filled by special election unless there's not enough time to administer one before the next regular election.
Except the next election already happened. He won. Won't he be able to just take his spot in the house in January (if the AG shit doesn't pan out)?
He resigned from Congress.
Yes. His current term would have ran until January. But he also ran for reelection and won. Did he say he wouldn't take his seat for the 2025-26 session when he resigned?
It might depend on that ethics report and how much he wants to keep it private.
Huh. Haven't heard a word. But hell, I'll take anyone over Gaetz. I keep wanting to ask his supporters, "What exactly has he done for us? Other than make himself the laughing stock of Congress?"
He did have something great he was pushing for a minute. Something to do with childcare or maternity leave? Can't remember, but it was something the whole nation really needs. Got real quiet on it, real fast.
One smart thing he did was STFU before the original court case, which never got off the ground for lack of witnesses, and the before the House investigation. Gosh, the poor man just didn't have time between scandals to represent us! (Jesus. I just realized that's what his voters would actually say.)
In other Gaetz news, I snatch about a dozen yard signs after the election. Pro tip: Bend the wire legs into a U, hang on a rope between trees, receive perfect targets!
You might be thinking of the bill he cosponsored with AOC, about banning members of Congress from trading stocks.
Who would do such a thing to an individual of Gaetz's quality? I'd imagine there's a lot of people that would.
raises hand
🤞
According to a source familiar with the matter and an email viewed by CBS News, the person who gained access went by the name "Altam Beezley."
Classic altam!
Anagram for A Tamely Bezel
Seems like people need to up their cybersecurity game.
In general yes, but in this particular case I think it's just about high enough.
Gaetz insisted on hiring a 17 year old to manage cybersecurity, what do you expect would happen.
I'd expect him to get high on molly and pay her for sex.
Justice
Leak it, share it, post it for wide availability.
Can I authorize everyone in the country for access please
Oh no 🙃
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
228 points (97.5% liked)
politics
19103 readers
3450 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS