204
Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rusty@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 month ago

This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions ๐Ÿ‡and ๐Ÿ.

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 31 points 1 month ago

golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out

[-] myslsl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Those are backups in case the other functions break down.

[-] TheCoolerMia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 month ago

๐ŸŠ isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange

[-] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago

But what if it was grown in Europe?

[-] swab148@startrek.website 15 points 1 month ago
[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

So to clarify, definitely European and not African?

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know falls to his death

[-] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Americans will use anything other than metric

[-] ganoo_slash_linux@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 37 points 1 month ago

"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]

scrรถdinger's TeX

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 22 points 1 month ago

I can answer the question. No.

[-] yeahiknow3 6 points 1 month ago

Heโ€™s right.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 month ago

Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce ๐Ÿ‡ and๐Ÿ?

[-] RandomWalker@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyโ€™ll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyโ€™re falling asleep years from now.

[-] myslsl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?

[-] someacnt_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ๐ŸŠ

By using ๐ŸŠ to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is

[-] LifeLemons@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I am waiting for someone to actually answer this

[-] wisha@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago
[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving ๐Ÿ˜…

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.

[-] wisha@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago
[-] yeahiknow3 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.

[-] SepulchravesLibrary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
204 points (94.7% liked)

196

16746 readers
1903 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS