161
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by voxel@infosec.exchange to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Warning to all Brave Browser Users

Blocking variations.brave.com which is used for A/B testing could potentially break Brave's functionalities. For me did Brave's "forgetful browsing" feature broke which seems to be disabled by default if you block this domain.

#brave #bravebrowser #privacy @privacy @privacyguides

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com 199 points 1 year ago

You really just shouldn't use brave..

[-] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Do you think we are not Brave enough.

Sorry... I will see myself out.

load more comments (55 replies)
[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 107 points 1 year ago

Anyoneserioius about privacy should not be using a chromium browser, and should definitely not be using brave.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 year ago

Firefox is safer and tbh, has probably the best UX and aesthetics out of anyone. Brave is garbage.

[-] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 year ago

For incognito browsing I recommend Librewolf, a firefox fork. If you want anything more secure, you should start looking into tor

[-] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Why is librewolf superior to our of the box Firefox? Or mullvad browser for that matter?

[-] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

It has included some privacy measures to resist fingerprinting like letterboxing and has more privacy focused search engines as default like searx. Also it takes out some firefox utilities like pocket which I don't really use

As for Mullwav browser I'm not really sure, it seems to be another reinforced firefox like librewolf

[-] KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Btw, here is a detailed, technical review. It is in German, but with transtae and all the code, it should be understandable.

TLDR: It's good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stifle867@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

As a Firefox user, the only thing Brave does that I wish Firefox would copy is their fingerprinting resistance. I know Firefox does have fingerprinting resistance but it's nowhere near the same level as Brave.

[-] the_lone_wolf@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Use privacy badger extension

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Brave is just a shill for Google mothership. Firefox is leading privacy and security through browsers.

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Firefox has a weaker sandbox than chromium and less mature site isolation and therefore has lower security. privacy is a different story, but remember you're only as private as you are secure so Firefox is inherently not that private assuming a malicious site escapes the sandbox.

I'm fully against chrome's growing monopoly as well as Google surveillance capitalism but let's not be so dramatic with the "google mother ship" nonsense.

using chromium as a base does not equal data being sent back to Google, just like using Android as a base doesn't inherently send data back to Google.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Boring@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Firefox is fine, but saying chromium is spyware because its primarily maintained by google is like saying android is spyware.

Additionally chromium browsers are arguably more secure than Firefox, and has more advanced sand boxing. So much so that graphine OS used chromium instead of Firefox for their vanadium browser.

Only thing I agree with is not using brave.. Cause well.. They fishy.

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] the_lone_wolf@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Those who don't know about it go and read GNU replicantOS blog and wikipedia page

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Android is not a single OS (?)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Boring@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And I'm sure you only use twofish because the NSA backdoored AES when they standardized it.

[-] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

what does it have to do with Google's business model being mass-surveillance, and/or them being caught several times collaborating with the NSA, the US army, etc.?

I agree that the NSA backdooring stuff is a problem too... (or even a different facet of the same problem...) Yet, one doesn't invalidate the other...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] darklordcrouton@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I truly appreciate the perspective of this post. I would like to switch fully to Firefox and support the cause. Unfortunately I have a PWA addiction and that is the only thing keeping me living my shameful hybrid browser life.

Is it a weak reason? Probably. But it's an honest one. If Mozilla hopped on PWAs, I'd be totally fine bouncing from Brave and joining the Chromium rebellion.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dukethorion@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

I'll be the one to stay on topic instead of joining the omgchromebad crowd.

My question/concern would be, why would a browser need to connect to an outside source in order to Forget your browsing? What would it need to reference?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
161 points (93.0% liked)

Privacy

31874 readers
243 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS