169
submitted 3 weeks ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org

Archived version

“Instead of taking responsibility for peace and security in the world as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, China is opposing our core European interests with its economic and weapons aid to Russia,” German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said in an emailed statement before departing Berlin airport on Sunday for her two-day visit to Beijing.

Vladimir “Putin’s brutal war of aggression against Ukraine is a direct threat to our peace. I will also speak in Beijing about the fact that we cannot simply ignore this in our relations with China.”

The European Union is proposing to sanction several Chinese firms that it claims helped Russian companies develop attack drones that were deployed against Ukraine. Baerbock will meet her Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in Beijing to address this issue, her spokesman said. Germany’s top diplomat will also discuss the humanitarian situation in China, as well as EU tariffs against Chinese electric vehicles that were introduced in October.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de 45 points 3 weeks ago

PSA: election season has begun in Germany. The tone in the comments, and also fully fabricated "news stories" (not meaning this one), have increased dramatically.

The influence campaign has begun. Stay critical people.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

I'm still voting the Greens, they're the least terrible party

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

It really is that simple. Kinda sad, but also kinda nice not having to bother wrecking my brain on who to vote for.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org -1 points 3 weeks ago

Which goes to show how far Germany has fallen politically. The Left party split into an irrelevant part and a pro-Putin hard on immigration part (BSW). the Greens moved towards anti immigrant racism, lackluster climate protection and support for wanted war criminals. The SPD became the party of high finance tax robbers, anti immigrant racism and austerity. And i don't want to get started on the right side of politics somewhere between fascists and borderline fascists.

[-] Melchior@feddit.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

And when was it better? The Left party was not really more radical left leaning then the Greens, when they actually were in government. The Greens approved the hollowing out of the welfare state with the SPD, which btw is currently less racist then under Schmidt.

[-] SomeOneWithA_PC@feddit.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

Greens moved towards anti immigrant racism, lackluster climate protection and support for wanted war criminals.

No they didn't. They are the once that pushed the most forward while still being reasonable and open for compromise. They are the biggest/strongest reason that there is a move towards climate protection and they criticized war criminals all the time.

The more bullshit i hear against Greens the stronger i know a vote for the greens is the right thing to do.

[-] federalreverse@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean ... I really wish it were different but almost the entire Greens group in Bundestag voted in favor of the "Security Package" only a month ago, despite it introducing more social insecurity for migrants. Of course, the goal was saving the coalition — but they did so voting by in favor of a law that (pending court decisions) contains most likely unconstitutional/EU-incompatible sections to do so. And the coalition then failed less than a month after that.

Of course, large parts of the party base don't agree, and the last party conference showed that.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

The Left was always just the leftovers of SED

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

That is false. The left in Western Germany cannot be a leftover from the SED. There was no SED in Western Germany. There is some personal continuity in former Eastern Germany, whose influence got less over time. By this logic the CDU, CSU, FDP and to some extent SPD could also be considered leftovers of the NSDAP.

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

I think the poster meant the party the Left.

There was no SED in Western Germany.

While technically no proper part of Western Germany, you still might want to check out this.

By this logic the CDU, CSU, FDP and to some extent SPD could also be considered leftovers of the NSDAP.

This is something that you can find in discussions on here.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

The left the party, not the left the political spectrum.

[-] jagermo@feddit.org 18 points 3 weeks ago

You are right, however I don't have a feeling the Baerbock has changed her demeanor, she was pretty outspoken the whole time - at least compared to the foreign ministers before her.

But yes, a lot of politicians will suddenly simulate a spine for a few weeks.

[-] SomeOneWithA_PC@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

She is pretty good and you can clearly see that she is working differently and more in the right direction than anyone before.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

isn't it awesome that those mis- and de-information campaigns can get away with it scotch free? That foreign powers can influence sovereign elections willy nilly?

its so fricking disgusting and sad.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yet another externality of the neoliberal system. Who knew free flow of capital can also flow to individuals in or running for office.

[-] 0x815@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago

China Is Studying Russia’s Sanctions Evasion to Prepare for Taiwan Conflict -- (Archived link)

China has been supporting Russia’s economy since the start of the Ukraine war by buying its oil while supplying it with everything from microelectronics to washing machines.

Meanwhile, Beijing has been getting its own strategic benefit: a real-world case study in how to circumvent Western sanctions.

An interagency group, set up by China in the months following the full-scale invasion, has studied the impact of sanctions and produced reports regularly for the country’s leadership, according to people familiar with the matter. The goal is to draw lessons about how to mitigate them, particularly in case a conflict over Taiwan prompts the U.S. and its allies to impose similar penalties on China, the people said.

As part of the effort, Chinese officials periodically visit Moscow to meet with the Russian Central Bank, the Finance Ministry and other agencies involved in countering sanctions, the people said.

The Chinese study effort, which hasn’t previously been reported, is emblematic of the new age of economic warfare unleashed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where the lines between economic policy and geopolitical strategy are increasingly blurred. That trend is only likely to be amplified by Donald Trump’s second presidential term, where he plans to turbocharge the use of tariffs as a tool for negotiation and coercion.

[-] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Seems a bit off to study something in order to draw lessons that is highly influenced by the own behaviour.

Sure, if there were a second China that would fill the role China is currently playing in easing the effect of the sanctions, they should be alright. But who should that be?

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
169 points (96.2% liked)

Europe

1668 readers
410 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS