698
submitted 1 year ago by chloyster@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 258 points 1 year ago

Other devs, please follow suit.

This industry needs class consciousness in it yesterday.

Just because you're paid well doesn't mean you're not being mistreated.

It's valid to be thankful for what you have but to also know you deserve more.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 70 points 1 year ago

I wish developers would learn that just because they're well paid doesn't mean they're getting the full value of their work. Your CEO didn't become a billionaire by paying you the full value of your labor.

There's always room for more and unions can get that.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is from a Swedish perspective, but: My experience with unions has been that they think it's more important that nobody is paid more, than to pay everyone what they're worth. In other words they'd prefer everyone being paid equally over raising the minimum wage. Their motivation seems based in jealousy more than a sense of justice. The money they collect from their members is spent on offering stupid IT courses that nobody (except unskilled people) needs, or stuffing their own pockets.

I like the idea of a union, but to me it seems like the actual unions we have today either lack real problems to solve or forgot about them. Every time a representative comes to visit I just get angered by how out of touch they are. They should focus on their core values and get rid of all that idiotic fluff, so they can lower their fees and recruit more members. But like any organization they grew fat and slow.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Lack real problems to solve? Wtf. Also your experience with unions seem very biased.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

*or forgot about them.

Ensuring that people know how to use Excel is not a problem that the union should be spending money on.

At my office we can work at any hours of the day that we prefer, as long as we check with our coworkers and do our agreed 40 hours / week. When the union heard about this they told my employer that we must do all our work during daytime.

Their reasoning was that our liberal hours give us the opportunity to take on more obligations in our personal life at daytime (such as taking kids to soccer practice) which means we have to work in evenings to make up for lost time. And this, in turn, means we don't get enough rest. So basically they don't trust the employees to take responsibility for how much rest they need and want to stop them from doing personal chores during the day.

We (the employees) finally won against the union in this, but what I kept thinking during this ordeal was "jeez, don't they have more important issues to address?" If they did, why would they be meddling with this.

[-] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I think you don't understand unions or what they are fighting for. Your presumed freedom in working hours is exactly what the unison stated. If you need freetime to fix chores you should reduce your working hours and not work throughout the night.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but then that's my choice to reduce my working hours, not something my union should force on me. It's patronizing. All ~100 employees disagreed with the union on this. IMO that's a sign that they are overreaching and forget who they are working for. They need to realize when they are done and just sit back and enjoy what they've accomplished, instead of mindlessly optimizing for the wrong target. At any rate, if this is the kind of stuff they pull I won't want to support them, because to my mind they are making things worse, not better.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

Every single industry needs unionized, the country is FUCKED right now for millions of it's inhabitants.

[-] reinar@distress.digital 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just because you're paid well doesn't mean others are not being mistreated

FTFY
without unions there could be a huge salary disparity between devs in the same role, in the same company, even in the same project. I've personally witnessed more than 2x, heard about even more.

Sometimes it's more than justified with individual's performance and impact, sometimes it's not. Some people are just better skill-wise, some people are better at applying pressure on their employer, holding business-critical knowledge hostage or simply negotiating.

Point here is - while unionizing might make things better on average, there would be a very real pushback from people who are benefitting from current system and this is not necessarily management. For management in some cases it would be even a net benefit, since they don't have to deal with primadonnas and someone tying things to themselves just for leverage.

As an engr manager, I've often seen disparity as a result of being hired during good years vs bad years for the company. Or when someone gets a better offer to leave, the company may change their pay but no one else's. Or hiring externally vs a transfer from another internal team. Or whether the team is coding for frontend web vs dev tools, even if using the same language. Or if female.

It's always a challenge for one person to fix -- with HR, with the department head, with yearly budget. And sometimes fixing one disparity means not having the sway to fix another as well.

Which is to say -- pay transparency and unions are good for everyone. And if the company can't afford to treat the employees equitably, then the company shouldn't exist. (Or it should reduce its avocado toast budget.)

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Eh, more of a case by case basis in the tech industry imo. Most game studio devs should probably unionize, but it's not all horror stories everywhere. I'm not against unionization by any means and it's always on the table, but when me and my coworkers already have great pay, great benefits, stable careers, and great work life balance I don't really see what additional benefits it would bring. It's an over-generalization to say that you'll be earning more money as a union employee when you're already making more than 90% of the population, I know first hand that some trades even make more than their unionized counterparts in my area.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 24 points 1 year ago

It would being better pay, better benefits, even more stable careers and better work-life balance.

It doesn’t matter how much money you’re already making, or how good your benefits already are. If you have a Union, you can negotiate for improvements. There is always room for improvement, unless you’re working at a fully-mutual workers cooperative.

I know first hand that some trades even make more than their unionized counterparts

I’d be interested to learn more, do you have a source or anything?

[-] Moonguide@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

This, plus, relying on the goodwill of someone who benefits from you earning as little as possible is a terrible idea.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I already negotiate. Every couple years I interview around, I get a job offer, I take it back it my employer and they either match it or I leave. I've personally increased my salary 6x since I've joined the industry about a decade ago, I know people who have increased it more. I don't know anyone in a unionized field who's managed to achieved anything like this. I don't know that it's impossible, just seems to be much more rare. I'm a specialized individual in a specialized industry, I already have bargaining power and I definitely reject that my compensation, benefits, job stability, and WLB would be better if I had been unionized this whole time.

I’d be interested to learn more, do you have a source or anything?

Like I said, first hand. Purely anecdotal, I'm sure it isn't the case for all union jobs.

[-] off_brand_@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

This does suck though. To start, a counter-offer-based model begs discrimination. You should be getting yearly raises commensurate with (at absolute bare minimum, not even necessarily accounting for inflation) the increase in productivity from year to year.

This is to say nothing of work environments. Unions could reduce or end crunch. Not just as hard blockers, but mandating the kind of project management that doesn't require crunch.

There's also a history of wage suppression.

https://www.inc.com/jeremy-quittner/silicon-valley-wage-collusion-class-action.html

They'll only get better at it, especially as the market continues to turn and companies continue to consolidate.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

This does suck though. To start, a counter-offer-based model begs discrimination. You should be getting yearly raises commensurate with (at absolute bare minimum, not even necessarily accounting for inflation) the increase in productivity from year to year.

I see that a lot with just the starting percentages of yearly raises. Most companies never keep up with market value, and by the time you've spent ten years there, you're making much lower than the industry standard.

The worst is employers who have some 1-5 scale for yearly performance and they gatekeep bosses who try to give out too many 5s. It's not a competition among your peers. If the whole team is doing good and working hard, then reward all of them.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know about discrimination, you'd have to provide actual statistical evidence of that for me to believe it.

I do get yearly raises, they've beaten inflation by a lot every year except for one. I left that job and took a 30% compensation increase elsewhere.

I rarely see crunch time. I have no problems whatsoever with the frequency and intensity of it, but if it became a problem I'd leave and find a job elsewhere.

I don't work in silicon valley, but they make a lot more than I do and my wage doesn't feel suppressed lol.

The job market in tech is alive and well in my experience. There was overhiring during the pandemic which ended with some layoffs, I don't see that as the market turning, but we'll have to wait and see.

I know Lemmy wants everyone everywhere unionized, but for me in my industry the arguments for it are hand wavy at best. I find it disingenuous to tell people in this industry that they don't have bargaining power as an individual.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not that you don’t have individual bargaining power. It’s just that if you were unionised, you’d have much more.

The extent to which you are arguing against overwhelming evidence cannot be understated. You are arguing against something less controversial than evolution.

We know that unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions.

But that’s not all unions do. Unions also have powerful effects on workers’ lives outside of work.

High unionization levels are associated with positive outcomes across multiple indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being

Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%.

Unionized workers are more likely to receive paid leave, have health insurance and pension plans.

Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than nonunionized workers.

Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave

How unions help all workers

Workers get significant economic benefits from labor unions

Unionized workers earn 10.2% more than their non-union peers

Supporting workers’ right to organize is a key way to help boost wages and support quality jobs.

Unions provide major economic benefits for workers and families

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Like I said, hand wavy at best

Edit: Lol this dude ran back and added sources to previous comments after I called him out on not providing sources. Before the edit he claimed collective bargaining can get 50% raises for everyone.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

How is it hand wavy?!

Imagine you are an employer with 100 employees, presented with the following situations.

  1. One employee demands a pay raise of 50%, or he’ll leave.
  2. 80 employees, including the employee above, demand a pay raise of 50% or they’ll all leave.

In which of these two situations are you more likely to be willing to grant that 50% raise?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Every couple years I interview around, I get a job offer, I take it back it my employer and they either match it or I leave.

I don't even have to do that. My employer always give me good raises and even better bonuses. Every year.

Benefits are great. PTO is great. Work-life balance is great. No layoffs whatsoever. It's not just about making money for the company and the owners, but the rest of the employees as well.

I don't need the strife from trying to start a union here. Save it for companies that have pushed their employees too far. Unionize where it's going to have the greatest benefit.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Ever talked to the cleaning staff how they're faring? Your suppliers in Cambodia (or wherever)?

It's not that hard for capital to see reason when it comes to specialised, educated, and sometimes right out irreplaceable workers, but that doesn't mean that capital suddenly developed a conscience.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

We don't have cleaning staff. Try again.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blake@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

I definitely reject that my compensation, benefits, job stability, and WLB would be better if I had been unionized this whole time.

Why? What is your reasoning for rejecting this? Can you justify it? You’re just saying “no” without any thought or explanation. Do you just refuse to believe that things could be better?

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

... did you not read the rest of my comment?

And frankly that's not how this works. You're the one trying to convince me that a union is in my best interest, the burden of proof is on you and you've given no substantial evidence.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I read your whole comment, but at no point does it explain why you think you wouldn’t be able to negotiate improvements with a union. What you have written essentially amounts to:

“I was able to build a really beautiful cabinet with hand tools. I reject the notion that power tools make it easier to build cabinets. I know people who have power tools but they haven’t made cabinets as nice as mine.”

If you have multiple people as a group who have the power to completely sink a business negotiating together, they stand a much better chance of improving conditions than any of them do alone.

How are you reasoning against such a self-evidently true claim?

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My point is that skilled individuals in specialized fields already have strong individual bargaining power, something that you continue to underestimate in this thread. Collective bargaining is not risk free with one outcome, this is a fact that all the nuance free analogies in the world won't change. If the sector is overall happy with individual bargaining power you're going to need more proof than supposed "self-evident" claims.

Let me fix your analogy. A power tool salesman walks up to my door and tells me I have to throw out my hand tools because I can build cabinets much faster without them and then calls me an idiot for not wanting to throw away the tools I've mastered over the last decade.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I’m in the same field as you are with years more experience. Not only that, I have experience in management in the same field.

I am not denying that you have individual bargaining power that I’m sure you’re leveraging successfully.

I am just pointing out to you that if you were unionised, you’d have even more bargaining power which would almost definitely have resulted in a better outcome for you.

Collective bargaining may not be risk free, but it’s lower risk than individual bargaining, by definition.

There’s plenty of proof, and I don’t see why I need any more. You’re just refusing to acknowledge it, like a flat earther faced with the results of their experiment refusing to accept it. Just because you say “no, I don’t like this scientific proof” it doesn’t mean that I’m somehow failing to back up my argument when I refuse to give you more proof. You have THE proof of the matter. Accept it and be right, or reject it and be wrong. It’s up to you.

As for your analogy, being in a union does not mean you lose your individual bargaining rights, you can continue to negotiate your salary individually if you wish to do so. You do not lose any power or rights from being in a union. You only gain power.

[-] Steeve@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m in the same field as you are with years more experience.

Lol is this the point in your argument where you call me a kid?

Collective bargaining may not be risk free, but it’s lower risk than individual bargaining, by definition.

Lower risk often means lower reward, and I already consider individual bargaining in my field low risk.

There’s plenty of proof, and I don’t see why I need any more.

You've provided exactly zero links in this thread.

like a flat earther

And there it is! Again! So far you've called me anti-vax and a flat earther because your unlinked evidence and shitty anologies aren't convincing me of unproven theories in my field. This conversation is over and you've done more to hurt your cause than help here you condescending prick.

[-] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate the good faith you're putting into this. I tend to lean your way, but it's interesting to see this discussion play out. Thanks for being respectful. I appreciate it, even though (up to this comment) I'm just observing the thread.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 154 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe its just me but I'd be way more likely to buy a game if I knew it was made by well treated workers.

[-] jcarax@beehaw.org 51 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, it's not many of us. A lot of folks don't even not buy games that aren't good, if they're heavily marketed.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 39 points 1 year ago

Gamers™ are like baby birds constantly screaming for mom to vomit the next meal in their mouths. They want an 80 campaign they can marathon through in a week, then demand the Devs get immediately to work on the sequel which the absolutely want NOW NOW NOW

[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

And they'll complain even if they get exactly what they wanted.

[-] gk99@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

"Good" is subjective. I know CoD is mangled corporate moneygrab trash, but it's still really fun, so I play it. The only reason I bought Cyberpunk was because I knew everyone was going to be talking about it and I wanted to be able to be part of the conversation, and it didn't disappoint.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

bethesda seems to treat their workers very well, they have a great retention rate

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

But their recent games suck

[-] emmie@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Starfield problem isn't execution but the design. It was the least problematic launch ever

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

no, they don't

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 1 year ago

*Devs working in Poland. Unions in Europe are per profession or economic sector not per company.

[-] Kajo@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago

Unions don't work the same way in all european countries.

In France, the union I belong to is organized by local company and public service, with a spawling system of dual cascading federations by geographic sector and economic sector.

And there are several competing national union organizations which overlap. I don't know exactly how the other ones are organized

[-] ek1t6ufv@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Austria has basically one big union (ÖGB), in which there are specific unions for different industries.

So, yeah. Every country has their own history and different approaches to unionization.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

This is the difference between a trade union and an industrial union. You can join an industrial union elsewhere in Europe or even in the US, such as the IWW.

[-] I_Comment_On_EVERYTHING 41 points 1 year ago

Good for them! My union did massively right by me so far and as far as I am aware there have been zero downsides.

[-] Blake@feddit.uk 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For workers, unions are 100% upside.

The extent to which you are arguing against overwhelming evidence cannot be understated. You are arguing against something less controversial than evolution.

We know that unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions.

But that’s not all unions do. Unions also have powerful effects on workers’ lives outside of work.

High unionization levels are associated with positive outcomes across multiple indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being

Unions raise wages of unionized workers by roughly 20% and raise compensation, including both wages and benefits, by about 28%.

Unionized workers are more likely to receive paid leave, have health insurance and pension plans.

Unionized workers receive more generous health benefits than nonunionized workers.

Unionized workers receive 26% more vacation time and 14% more total paid leave

How unions help all workers

Workers get significant economic benefits from labor unions

Unionized workers earn 10.2% more than their non-union peers

Supporting workers’ right to organize is a key way to help boost wages and support quality jobs.

Unions provide major economic benefits for workers and families

[-] Sinfaen@beehaw.org 38 points 1 year ago

And Epic Games announced a big layoff coming soon. I dunno what's happening in the industry rn, but it's not looking good

[-] John_Coomsumer@beehaw.org 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only thing happening in the industry is the same thing happening in every industry and most of the first world:

The wealthy owners and executive leader roles have learned that COVID, COVID supply lines, interest rates, 'consumer sentiment', and inflation, are all very easy scapegoats that both the public and investors will easily buy as reasons for lowering product quality and availability, while also firing employees, squeezing the non-fired ones to death, and raising prices. This has lead to almost 2 straight years of corporations showing record profits (even adjusting for the inflation that they are largely responsible for in the first place).

This downward spiral will continue until some force with nearly as much power pushes back.

This is typically and ideally a representative government in the form of regulation or taxation. But the US government has suffered decades of regulatory capture and congressional gridlock.

So the only other potential option is a large amount of highly populated unions. Which have to fight against nearly 100 years of media and political demonization and nearly 150 years of 'american independent attitude'.

The perfect modern system has all 3 parties; unions, government, and corporations, equally strong and antagonistic. Just as the perfect modern government would have the executive, legislative, and judicial branches equally strong and antagonistic. Neither could be much farther from the case here.

Stronger bigger unions. Weaker smaller corporations. And a government that actually functions. All are necessary to fix our current shit show.

[-] Thalestr@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago

People with lots of money want even more money. Less employees means less money that has to be paid out which means more money in the short term. Makes line go up for a while. Makes suits happy.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
698 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30500 readers
76 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS