814
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Five@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] acutfjg@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

Gender affirming care you say?

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Just looks like black KKKowboy boots to me.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

ever seen the white boots he wears?

[-] FrostKing@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gosh can we focus on the important stuff? No one should care about the shoes he's wearing, he's a politician not a fashion model Focus on the crooked politician stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

putler, trump, kim, desantis. All in lifts.

[-] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Looks like the second and third layers of lift have shifted under his toes.

[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Manlets never learn.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh so he and Putin use the same cobbler! Tracks.

[-] FormerlyChucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

I guess we've found the new home of /r/Politics. Good to know which communities we should block.

[-] braxy29@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is there supposed to be a lift inside the shoe? because the height of the visible heel just looks normal to me. dressy boots often have a pretty noticeable stacked heel.

disclaimer - i'm no fan of DeSantis

edit - okay, video at the link has made it all abundantly clear!

[-] Foreverlad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I didn't understand the drama myself, until I realized the toes of the boots are empty- just looking at them, you can see they're essentially deflated.

[-] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Click on the link, it illustrates. But yes, the heel inside is higher than on the outside, that's why they're boots.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago

He’s bad enough as he is- do we really need to stoop to their level of pettiness? This is the type of shit that conservatives get a boner for.

[-] 5in1k@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I’m petty as shit. It’s time to bully these shitheads. Going high got us jack.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
814 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19223 readers
3208 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS