817
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Stamets@startrek.website to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 year ago

When people ask me why I don’t have children, this is why. I’ve yet to be beaten in combat.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Imagine a society where men withold sex until they are physically dominated, leading to women becoming more aggressive and violent as their biological clocks tick down until they reach a pinnacle of adeptness and take a mate, or form coalitions of less capable women to secure a mate at the cost of sharing.

If only we had the self control...

[-] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Chainmail would not protect your from a flail. chainmail is really only protective against cutting/slashing. Chain does nothing for blunt force.

[-] DudeDudenson 2 points 1 year ago

What would protect you against blunt force?

[-] ChamrsDeluxe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Plate armor is your best bet. Padding helps, which was worn under chain. The padded garment worn under chainmail is called gambeson. Gambeson would help, but it wasn't close to perfect. Put on a dense, thick puffy coat and have someone hit you with a steel baseball bat as if they were trying to kill you. You'll feel it. Plate armor is the best choice. Obviously with enough blows from a hammer or mace and it could cave in and crush you, but that was rare. Best way to kill a knight in full plate was to get a few of your friends, pile on him, and put a dagger in the gaps of the armor. Throat, thighs, groin, anywhere there would be gaps in the armor.

[-] JeanTahra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago
[-] DudeDudenson 1 points 1 year ago

Weren't war hammers specifically used to fight against plate?

[-] JeanTahra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty much yes. Blunt force is kinda the apex. No amount of personal protection protects you enough when the force hits. With plate you would disperse it to kinda spread it through the area of the plate itself and with padding you would divert force into deformations of the padding. But given enough force neither of them protects you.

That being said those protective options are still the best there are against blunt force and that would remain until the introduction of firearms.

[-] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Your dad is right. A flail is an incredibly impractical weapon that's unsafe for the wielder. For close quarters unarmored combat, find yourself a woman who's handy with a dagger or smallsword. With the understanding that she's also proficient with a good polearm or bow for the fighting in the field.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm partial to women who are skilled with tonfa.

[-] BobbyNevada@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago

That's wife material, right there.

[-] JoShmoe@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

As well as ex-wife material.

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Widow material if they don't practice safer sex.

[-] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago

the "10 years later" is the most accurate part

[-] redballooon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
817 points (97.7% liked)

Comic Strips

12663 readers
3102 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS