591
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

ETA: Paywall bypass link: https://archive.is/vyU15

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 267 points 1 week ago

Amazing how much the US judiciary branch seems to hate the plebs.

[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 100 points 1 week ago

Republicans have spent the last 40 years purchasing the entire system, obviously it works for them. They're the ones that paid for it.

load more comments (51 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 94 points 1 week ago

Note that it piggybacks on the SCROTUS decision earlier about preventing government from protecting anything from industry.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] notannpc@lemmy.world 239 points 1 week ago

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

One could go for a hundred years and not touch this shit. But nah. Some dirtbag judge asshole actively working to fuck us all over.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This isn't "our government" these are the oligarch's meatbags purchased for surprisingly low dollar amounts. These men (and women that silently stand next to them until they are told they are allowed to speak) are cowards and traitors. They are not "our government"

Your post is the right energy, wrong message.

[-] Juigi@lemm.ee 50 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

It's currently not fill with people who want to help "prople". It currently is setup to help corporate America only at this point. At the expense of your rights.

[-] VoidBorn 2 points 1 week ago

I believe we call them Corporate-Americans these days, they're legally people.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 151 points 1 week ago

If the FCC can't regulate anything I guess I'll just run a high power jammer and block all cell signal in the area.

[-] westyvw@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago

Wait! You will get in trouble for that. Instead you need to have an LLC that does that for Profit somehow. Then all is forgiven!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 142 points 1 week ago

Their excuse is that telecom services aren’t actually providing telecom services, but information services.

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you aren’t brain-damaged.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 44 points 1 week ago

Courted reclassified the services to remove FCC ability to regulate telecos?

Talk about bad faith behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackout@fedia.io 133 points 1 week ago

All laws protecting the people's interests are now banned. Don't like it? Well become a billionaire and maybe the supreme Court will care

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 week ago

otoh:

Mike Masnick @mmasnick.bsky.social‬

I mean, this is a terrible (if unsurprising) decision, but I'm left wondering how Brendan Carr is going to still try to claim regulatory authority over social media companies...

There is no possible consistency between "ISPs can throttle and block, but edge services cannot..." ‪nilay patel‬ ‪@reckless.bsky.social‬

2h

Sixth Circuit decision striking down net neutrality doesn’t even remotely pass the sniff test lol www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...

January 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM

https://bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social/post/3lerv476tes22

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 1 week ago

comes a time when blue states just need to draw the line and flat out refuse to follow federal laws and judges until federal judges stop being corrupt.

[-] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 47 points 1 week ago

They do it for marijuana laws but won’t treat anything else like that. I don’t understand.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 29 points 1 week ago

Money.

Lots of potential tax revenue with cannabis.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

You say "secede" funny.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 week ago

They're going to use this for censorship.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

But they'll call it freedom of speech. Speech someone/corp paid for of course, but Citizens United...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago

Torproject.org. There's absolutely no way to censor the entire internet, short of entirely disconnecting the internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago

long-winded sigh

I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up...

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago

Is this really shocking with the incoming sadministration?

That's not a typo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.

“Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.’s vacillations,” the court ruled.

"Nyyeaahh nyyeaah nyyeaaaahh ppffthhhhthhth!!" they said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Like most large changes, it requires an act of Congress. Doing these via the executive leads to weak outcomes like this.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago

The thing is Congress doesn't have time to deal with technical details. That's why they passed a law authorizing the FCC to make exactly this kind of regulation. The conservative courts throwing everything they don't like under the Major Questions Doctrine is just a way to make sure regulation never happens and Corporations are free to exploit people however they want. The problem here isn't the FCC, it's bad faith judges with the power to stop the entire government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

This is ridiculous how difficult it is to get this law through. Clearly it must be something good. I am 100% behind it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

tbf it's not hard to convince hayseed chucklefuck trumplings that regulations which exist to protect them are a bad thing because they cost money. we had condo buildings collapsing and people dying WITH regulations.

when bridges start collapsing left and right, they'll blame drag queens and the maga trumpistan patriots will lap it up like hogs at the trough

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
591 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60351 readers
4787 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS