[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Attitudes like yours certainly isn't attracting any new users...

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I think you are conflating two things. We can have a viable third party with ranked choice voting. We don't necessarily need PR.

Personally I think PR will fragment the parliament and destabilise the government.

Also if you look at 2024, PR would've given many seats to Reform....

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago
[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Humanity is just a prolonged organic chemical reaction happening on an insignificant speck of dust floating in space. We are not that important.

Universe is still insane though, but for different reasons.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So I did a quick pass through the paper, and I think it's more or less bullshit. To clarify, I think the general conclusion (different languages have similar information densities) is probably fine. But the specific bits/s numbers for each language are pretty much garbage/meaningless.

First of all, speech rates is measured in number of canonical syllables, which is a) unfair to non-syllabic languages (e.g. (arguably) Japanese), b) favours (in terms of speech rate) languages that omit syllables a lot. (like you won't say "probably" in full, you would just say something like "prolly", which still counts as 3 syllables according to this paper).

And the way they calculate bits of information is by counting syllable bigrams, which is just.... dumb and ridiculous.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I am pretty skeptical about these results in general. I would like to see the original research paper, but they usually

  1. write the text to be read in English, then translate them into the target languages.
  2. recurit test participants from ~~US~~ western university campuses.

And then there's the question of how do you measure the amount of information conveyed in natural languages using bits...

Yeah, the results are mostly likely very skewed.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 104 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

this argument isn't going to work on someone who believes god created said lead... and also, pretty sure not all lead was created from nuclear decay.

i get dunk on people feels satisfying, but this is just bad science communication through and through

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Sure, but do realise sometimes not having an opinion is a very privileged position to be in. There are others who are forced to have an opinion, or are currently being forced to live someone else's opinion.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago

Germany is the best at recycling plastics in the world, yet they recycle less than half of all plastics... I won't call that misinformation based on this. Also please don't twist our words, we aren't saying recycling is a scam in general, just plastic recycling is a scam,

When we call plastic recycling a scam, we are advocating for not using plastics. Reduce, reuse, recycle, remember that.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago

And they did, literally destroyed a couple fuel pumps at two gas stations: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/apr/28/just-stop-oil-protesters-sabotage-petrol-pumps-on-m25-motorway

Did you hear about that on the news? Did you see this being posted on Lemmy?

Now you know why they have to do what they do.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

IIRC these are words from the man himself. In a documentary about him, he said he was not a hero, just an ordinary guy, and you should not need to be a hero to stand up and do the right thing.

view more: next ›

nialv7

joined 8 months ago