31
submitted 1 year ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

BBC News - Alec Baldwin may be recharged with Rust gun death because of 'additional facts' https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67141319

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I really don't understand how they can get him for anything in relation to handling the gun. None of the safety stuff is the actor's job.

Now since he was one of the head honchos on the picture they could go after him for negligence there, but the whole "pull the trigger" thing is weird to me. Actors do that on set all the time while pointing weapons they've been given at crew. It's part of making movies.

[-] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It seems like there are a lot of people who took a course and now consider themselves experts on gun safety. They don't seem to understand that movies use completely different safety rules, because when they make a movie they have to break all the normal rules. Or maybe they're just being deliberately obtuse because they hate Baldwin for his politics.

[-] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The actor said at the time that he drew back the hammer on the pistol, but did not pull the trigger.

Charges were dropped […] after it was reported that the .45 Colt revolver had been modified with a new trigger in a way that could have made a misfire more likely.

Experts […] concluded there was no way for the gun to have been fired without the trigger being pulled.

[-] hiddengoat@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Prosecutors then had the replica gun forensically tested and had some parts of the weapon replaced after it was broken during the FBI's testing.

This is pretty much a mistrial right here, if it even gets that far. It would take barely more than zero effort to make the case that altering the firearm after the FBI's testing was enough to invalidate any results the prosecutors came up with.

I do not know why this is even a point that matters. He was on a set, in his capacity as an actor, blocking a scene with the cinematographer. This was a scene in which the gun was fired close to the camera. Him pulling the trigger was his job. The fact that the armorer did not do their fucking job and control live weapons on set is where the culpability actually is.

[-] Hobart_the_GoKart@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't that be double jeopardy? Or no because he wasn't tried? Genuine question... I don't know a lot of the details.

[-] ZooGuru@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think what you’re saying is correct in terms of him not being tried. You can’t be tried for the same crime twice.

[-] ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

He hasn't been tried yet. The initial charges were dismissed before trial started. Those details were in the article.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Additional - alternative facts.

this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
31 points (84.4% liked)

News

23311 readers
3399 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS