214
💀
Didn't a similar thing happen after the Civil War?
As part of the deal, she will serve six years of probation, will be fined $6,000 and will have to write an apology letter to Georgia and its residents. She also agreed to testify truthfully against her co-defendants at future trials.
They gave her what barely amounts to a slap on the wrist. I hope they did so in exchange for some pretty damning testimony.
Probation isn't nothing, but this type of deal is an incentive to testify against others.
I wonder if this will at least prevent Powell from practicing law.
I think it's a maybe.
That's a manicure.
It's amazing how frequently Trump's lawyers end up convicted of serious crimes. Combine that with his history of refusing to pay them and it makes you wonder why even the sludge scraped off the bottom of the barrel is willing to represent him these days.
Because each sludge lawyer thinks "sure, Trump stiffed all his previous lawyers and many of them ended up in prison and/or losing their law licenses, but I'm smart and loyal to Trump. This won't happen to ME!"
A few months later, they are facing prison and a brand new lawyer is telling themselves that THEY won't go through this because THEY are smart and loyal. And the cycle continues.
It sounds like this Scott Graham Hall guy flipped on Sidney. So now who's Sidney going to flip on?
She was in a lot of meetings with a lot of people, including Trump and Giuliani. I bet she has a lot to say about that.
That's how a RICO case against the mob works. It's flips all the way up to the top.
I fucking love dominoes.
The Kraken has turned state's evidence. Time for more rats to jump ship. The probation only deals are likely to be very limited time.
Spicy! I wonder what she gave up.
Given how solid Fani Willis's case already is, I'm betting it's going to be some witness cooperation.
Either way, her co-conspirators should be more than a little concerned.
Donald Trump is going to die in custody.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
ATLANTA (AP) — Lawyer Sidney Powell pleaded guilty to reduced charges Thursday over efforts to overturn Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election in Georgia, becoming the second defendant in the sprawling case to reach a deal with prosecutors.
Powell, who was charged alongside Trump and 17 others with violating the state’s anti-racketeering law, entered the plea just a day before jury selection was set to start in her trial.
She was initially charged with racketeering and six other counts as part of a wide-ranging scheme to keep the Republican president in power after he lost the 2020 election to Democrat Joe Biden.
The acceptance of a plea deal is a remarkable about-face for a lawyer who, perhaps more than anyone else, strenuously pushed baseless conspiracy theories about a stolen election in the face of extensive evidence to the contrary.
A lower-profile defendant in the case, bail bondsman Scott Graham Hall, last month pleaded guilty to five misdemeanor charges.
The indictment says a person who is not named sent an email to a top SullivanStrickler executive and instructed him to send all data copied from Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Coffee County to an unidentified lawyer associated with Powell and the Trump campaign.
The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
214 points (99.5% liked)
politics
18894 readers
6116 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS