this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
-25 points (9.7% liked)

Conservative

315 readers
43 users here now

We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.

People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.

Rules:
-Good Faith participation only.

-Stay on topic.

-Follow instance rules.

-Absolutely no homophobia, transphobia or misgendering anyone.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoshuaBrusque@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This nation does not have intelligence, based on the voting numbers.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

We're entering a new era where our national security is significantly reduced. Tulsi Gabbard is a Science of Identity cult adherent who has no internal political compass and is probably compromised. It's just really hard to fathom what the Republican party has become to approve of this nomination.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Impressive.

Vice Chair of the Democratic National Committee having endorsed Biden in 2020 to the Director of National Intelligence under a republican president she opposed in 9 years

Sounds like a really trustworthy person to have in charge of national security /s

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see much National but I see a lof of foreign Intelligence...

[–] ravshaul@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Now between her and Trump, they can cripple the CIA. The "national security" catch-all is a sales line for their conjob. The CIA have different priorities than mass casualty attacks on the people.