87
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Joejimbobjones@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

I am really having trouble believing it went down like that. Analyzing one specific runners routine is more like stalking than anything. Especially given that there is a wealth of material on high mileage plans (Pfiitzinger anyone?).

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

...Being inspired by a professional's methods is not stalker behavior. If he was a stalker, you'd think he'd know what the runner looked like, yeah?

[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social -5 points 1 year ago

This feels very much like an /r/thathappened post

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

As a running enthusiast whose varied from running ~25 miles a week to having to restart from nothing, what the guy is talking about is extremely common. I've followed many different plans from many runners, sometimes their names are attached, sometimes not, and most of them I couldn't tell you what they look like. I will say Olympic runners are the most common. I've even come across hers. Nothing about this rings as implausible to someone remotely interested in the topic. I guess I could understand from a total outsider perspective, but from someone who looks into that topic often? Absolutely plausible. I see no reason not to believe them.

Edit: the amount of stories Tony Hawk posts like this and never gets questioned also just makes me wonder a bit about why multiple people have already commented the way you did.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 year ago

I've never come across anyone that just pulls out a training schedule when I say "I run".

Usually there's some follow up questions about goals, training, whatever.

But just straight up grabbing your phone and pulling out a training schedule? THAT'S the implausible part, not that he was using her training schedule.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

You have no idea what the conversation is. It was boiled down to "I run." Why are you going out of your way to assume a whole bunch of stuff that isn't mentioned?

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

That's what I read between the lines. She's having a stab at someone who did exactly that.

I don't see the need to tell a professional runner how to run? I also don't see why she would hid that fact if the conversation went any further?

[-] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I also don't see why she would hid that fact if the conversation went any further?

If she's leaving stuff out, it's probably because Twitter has a character limit, not because she's trying to hide something.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You find it unlikely that someone who runs at the Olympic level would be amongst people that are likely to nerd out about their training schedules? Why? Clearly it's something they're passionate about. Why is it shocking they'd be around other folks passionate about it?

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This feels very much like a /r/nothingeverhappens comment.

[-] danwardvs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Inside you there are two wolves.

I mean, just consider how astronomically improbable the entire situation is for a second instead of falling for rage bait.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The only people who seem to be raging are the ones trying to intimate that its a fake scenario, everyone else seems to be rolling their eyes or chuckling.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It's extremely possible. I came across her plan in researching running. She's popular. Not all runners publish stuff. She's one of the few names in running I recognize but I couldn't for the life of me even describe what she looks like let alone recognize her on my own.

And why is this rage bait? Who is angry? It's humorous. Why do you assume folks are supposed to be angry reading this?

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
87 points (98.9% liked)

Don’t You Know Who I Am?

3800 readers
1 users here now

Posts of people not realising the person they’re talking to, is the person they’re talking about.

Acceptable examples include:

Discussions on any topic are encouraged but arguements are not welcome in this community. Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.

The posts here are not original content, the poster is not OP and doesn’t necessarily agree with or condone the views in the post. The poster is not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

Rules:

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Censor any identifying info of private individuals in the posts. This includes surnames and social media handles.
  4. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  5. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum. If you wish to discuss how this community is run please comment on the stickied post so all meta conversations are in one place.
  6. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  7. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  8. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  9. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

PLEASE READ LEMMY.ORG’S CITIZEN CODE OF CONDUCT: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

PLEASE READ LEMMY.WORLD’S CODE OF CONDUCT: https://lemmy.world/legal

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS