cross-posted from: https://lemy.lol/post/40100856
Who the fuck would vote in favor of more shit in the water supply?
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
62 points (98.4% liked)
Conservative
533 readers
67 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
People selling clean water.
Hi do you have a moment to tqlk about our lord and Savior Nestle
Republicans are like people from the Middle Ages that choose to be all ass backwards on purpose. It is such a joke. They need strong state legislators that fight back against this.
Shit in their own water too
Not that Id expect anyone to read the decision let alone understand the ruling but all that was rulled was that the EPA doesn't have the authority yo include end result requirements in permits. The EPA still has the authority to say San Francisco can't discharge poo into the Pacific Ocean or set allowable amounts of poo to be discharged. They can not hold San Francisco responsible for a TPM (turds per million) number for the Pacific Ocean.