this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
80 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38569 readers
407 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
80
US Justice Dept. Doubles Down on Request to Break Up Google (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 month ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@beehaw.org
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.08-140200/https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/07/technology/trump-google-search-antitrust.html

In a sign that President Trump is following the Biden administration’s lead in reining in Google, the Justice Department on Friday reiterated its demand that a court break up the search giant.

The request followed a landmark ruling last year by Judge Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia that found Google had illegally maintained a monopoly in online search by paying web browsers and smartphone manufacturers to feature its search engine. The judge is scheduled to hear arguments on proposed solutions from both the government and Google in April.

Under the Biden administration last year, the Justice Department and a group of states asked Judge Mehta in a preliminary filing to force Google to sell its popular web browser, Chrome, among other remedies. The department’s lawyers on Friday reiterated that demand, which could reshape internet competition.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago

i guess they have not 'contributed' enough to the new king yet.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 14 points 1 month ago

SURPRISED PICHAI FACE

Congratulations Sundar, another token well spent.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Ok what's the benefit Trump gets if Google is broken up?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Nothing. Its what HE gets for saving them from this fate.

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Google control the browser most people use and that browser could be defaulted to use a different search engine, which controls what you see when you have a question. They can take control from google and allow a real ally to buy it.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maar een tegenstander van een ban stelt: „Boycot liever alle nutteloze rommel die uit China komt.”

(Someone against a ban says: "Boycott all the useless stuff from China")

Why not both?

[–] melp@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

Hmm. I don't believe it.