this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1245 points (99.6% liked)

Work Reform

11252 readers
1534 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Remember when Ford had an amazing performance growth, made record profits, then laid off a huge amount of people and moved more business overseas. Nothing like capitalism to fire you when you're down and fire you when you're up!

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Or sharing profits among the leeches when it's going great, but when shit goes down they are begging for help from government and firing people. How about you not instantly take out profits but you build resillience through reserves and preparation? Lol, who am I kidding, milk the cow till it's dry and then make beef patties when it stops giving milk.

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

So he literally stole their salaries. We can't put up with millionair ceos anymore, it needs to be outlawed..

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the guy that commutes from LA to Seattle on a private jet?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Yeah, same guy who fired nearly everyone at the Chipotle corporate office in Denver so he didn't have to commute.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I'm just amazed no one goes Luigi when shit like that happens...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

OC to Seattle, but yes. The guy didn't want to relocate from Newport Beach, so they bought him a jet to make his weekly "commute."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Just for perspective here,

1000 * $15/hr = $15,000 / hr

$96,000,000 / $15,000  / hour = 6,400 hours

6,400 hours / 40 hours / week = 160 weeks

160 weeks / 52.17857 weeks / year = 3.0663929655412174 years

They could afford to keep those employees on for another 3 Years with that amount.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't get it. We did not let kings and lords and counts keep their belongings. Why are we treating this scum any different?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Billybob22@feddit.uk 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't use Starbucks anymore. It's American

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Don't use Charbucks anymore. It's shit coffee

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They could have paid every one of those employees nearly 6 figures instead. If the company is doing so badly that they feel they need to lay off a thousand people, they should not be handing out CEO bonuses, period.

[–] DogEarBookmark@reddthat.com 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure a good portion of that was union busting, but that's what we're all about now.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

This would not shock me in the slightest

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is the same douche canoe that was the CEO of Chipotle and denied that the serving sizes were getting smaller and told people to just harass the worker making the food if they thought their serving size was to small.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Also the same guy trying to green wash plastic waste to be customer responsibility while commuting on a private jet from Southern California to Seattle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's $96,000 per layed off worker

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago

96 million could pay the salaries of basically 2000 baristas

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's absolutely no way he's adding enough value compared to Joe MBA to justify that compensation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Friendly reminder, comrades: There is no such thing as a good billionaire. From the East to the West, they are humanity's enemy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gudl@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So who will be the next Luigi?

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I'm hedging my bets on a Mario. Let's a go! 🎲🎲

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There ain't no smile in those eyes. Creepy AF.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You have to be willing to exploit your fellow humans to get where he is. Either you don’t have a soul to start with or it gets torn to bits every step you take up the ladder.

I’ve known people like that. I’ve been very close to people like that. It’s crazy, everywhere they look they’re looking for some win/something they can take. They never feel guilty. Honestly, the only thing they feel is betrayal when someone won’t bend the knee.

That’s my little observation.

Sad thing is, they still have people who love them but they aren’t truly capable of reciprocating. Everything is transactional and they always expect it to be profitable for them. The only thing that truly hurts them is when it isn’t profitable. It sucks being caught in their orbit too. Believe me.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Boycott what you don't like. Vote with your money.

Haven't spent money in a Starbucks for over a decade...nor fast food chains, nor Walmart.

Did do a few Amazon purchases a few years ago and I still feel guilty about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dragonlobster@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Looks like Luigi got another flag to reach

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Starbucks gives the new CEO a $96 million bonus, then a month later, lays off 1,000+ ~~workers~~ Potential Luigis.

FTFY.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

So weird to pay someone that much.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If someone Luigi's him, they better spell his name wrong on the bullets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Coffeegrinder@feddit.nl 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gets invited to meeting with manager. Employee orders coffee for the meeting Manager says, his coffee will be "To Go"

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I work at a bakery (we’ve got snacks, coffee, cake, and danishes in addition to bread), and every once in a while I see two people come in and it’s not clear if they’re on a date until they disagree about whether it’s for here or to go. Then I realize that only one of them thought it was a date. It’s especially awkward if the one who did has already offered to pay for everything.

Doing that for a job instead of a date is brutal

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Cap the maximum compensation gap (including bonuses and stocks) between the highest paid and lowest paid person in a company at 1000:1. Any overpay goes into a UBI account that pays out equally to all.

[–] Zannsolo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Should be 30 :1 on whichever is lower average or median salary and contractors count if they perform core business functions/work on location.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Shifting "blame" on these white-collar police dogs (megacorp CEOs) instead of shareholders (and the system demanding growth) only needs to happen when everyone understands that even 96m is 2.6% of 3.760m of net income (2024).

So if 1k people were let go all of them could have gotten 1m of bonus and still the company would have made almost 3bn.

But they were let go bcs yoy income (but not revenue) was lower last year, and the financial markets demand a sacrifice (literally any action, even if not actually needed, just to send a signal they are 'on it').

The usual "efficient" meat grinder stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

I haven't seen someone with so punchable face

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›