this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
228 points (98.7% liked)

Fediverse

31941 readers
813 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I love the fact that fediverse was built from the ground up to be free, federated and interoperable. I have two questions that may come from my lack of expertise / knowledge, so I apologise in advance if they are dumb.

  1. Bots can disrupt smaller instances:

What is stopping corpos from scraping everyone's posts and stuff from the fediverse and train their AI? What's stopping them then, to create loads of not accounts and spam / disrupt smaller communities? When an instances quality drops, the users may be more incentivised to migrate to bigger instances and go there. It's safe to say most Lemmy users are not going to spin their own instance and start communities from scratch. Meanwhile, the onslaught of bots can overwhelm these budding communities and instances.

  1. Corpos can flood the fediverse with ads and crap:

Threads comes to mind on this point and how many instances have chosen not to defederate with them. Besides, they can create bridges, and have repost bots in all instances to flood major them with ads. With generative content, it is so much easier to make a seemingly casual post about a product and mask it as an advertisement.

I've seen previous posts about people wanting to come because of their opinion about how certain countries behave. I feel the true evil are the corporates.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 338 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Thankfully, there aren't any ads here. Just the thought of it stresses me out, and when I get stressed out, I reach for a Morley cigarette to keep my cool. The toasted tobacco and asbestos filter make for a smoother smoke, which soothes the throat. 9 out of 10 anti-ad, Fediverse, activists choose Morleys to keep up their pep and vigor in the fight against advertisement.

[–] artificialfish@programming.dev 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

more like comedy silver, amirite?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Legendary comment, take your internet points

[–] BrutallyHonestPOS@lemm.ee 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

thats another thing. no internet points, so no bots to farm them. upvotes really only indicate the quality of the post or comment that receives the upvotes. no way to use the total number of points to claim validity of your posts or to brag with them.

that being said, at one point we will need to figure out a way to identify and prevent bots that just post propaganda. while we wont have the problem of karmawhoring bots, they dont have the need to karmawhore and can try to spread their propaganda immediately.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Upvotes on a comment are still internet points :p also this comment was just made as lighthearted fun not as something serious

[–] BrutallyHonestPOS@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ok sorry :(

i am just worried that the idea of karma on lemmy starts to gain traction :D

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I never got why it was important to have "karma" tbh. Just encourages you to only post funny stuff or something the group in x community agrees with otherwise oh no you lose internet points 🫠

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Karma can be a useful trust signal, until it’s abused of course and gamified.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Who are you going to listen to? This guy?

Or Fred Flintstone?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 100 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 80 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Facebook tried and we scoffed.

It's called the Embrace, Extend, Extinguish strategy of dealing with threats. Microsoft have been endorsing Linux recently for this reason.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Microsoft have been endorsing Linux recently for this reason.

I doubt that's still the reason, I think they endorse it because they're making a shit ton of money using it on Azure.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nothing. Instances will have to take it upon themselves to defederate, just like how a lot of instances all decided to defederate from Threads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 68 points 1 week ago

If another instance started knowingly federating us ads, or fake content, I'd hit that defederate button very quick.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What is stopping corpos from scraping everyone's posts and stuff from the fediverse and train their AI? What's stopping them then, to create loads of not accounts and spam / disrupt smaller communities

Nothing stops them right now. Currently they're causing effective DDOS by scraping manually and there's no good way to block them except by going to extremes.

In fact, I would prefer if they just used their own instance to scrape content instead of causing downtimes like they do now.

Corpos can flood the fediverse with ads and crap:

For that, the solution is simple, we can defederate.

[–] totallyNotARedditor@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm new and still trying to learn. What would defederating imply? An instance being blocked by all other instances?

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly. See also Gab and Truth Social.

[–] totallyNotARedditor@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Am I reading this right? Meta tried to be compatible with Lemmy and every server owned agreed to mass block them and leave them out?

[–] moody 16 points 1 week ago

Not every instance blocked them, but many did.

The fear of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish got a hold of the fediverse when Threads was originally announced.

[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Not Lemmy specifically, but the broader fediverse (and probably mostly the microblog part dominated by Mastodon and its forks)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's nothing stopping them from hosting a massive instance. But people aren't forced to move there to interact with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 week ago

Nothing, but instances can defed from them if they wish and they can't stop that either.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are already training on the fediverse. If something is on the public web, you can assume it's in some training data somewhere

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wish ^there^ was a ~way~ to ~~easily~~ poison the input

But sadly this'll just be reality. The only thing we can do is either not use it or embrace it.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

We’ve already seen AI fall for obvious jokes, like whether you can melt an egg or put pineapple on pizza.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 25 points 1 week ago

1 - You can block/ignore entire instances. (spamming ones)

2 - If it gets big enough, you'll see legit instances band together and federate only among themselves (white-list, invite only to allow federation)

people will gravitate to these groups of instances if they are well moderated and keep that crap out.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They already tried it. It's called Threads. It exists. People use it. And other instances have the choice to simply not federate with them.

To me (as unpopular as this sounds) that's the beautiful thing about FOSS and about Federation in particular. No one is stopping anyone from creating their own instance. Even Corporations.

It's the ultimate expression of "Anyone can do what they want, say what they want, believe what they want...but no one else is in any way obligated to listen to them/federate with them"

I know of companies that host small mastodon instances for their staff to communicate back and forth. I know of similar setups with lemmy instances. Anyone can use the technology for anything they wish to.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What is stopping corpos from scraping everyone's posts and stuff from the fediverse and train their AI?

That very real and enforceable "this comment cannot be used to train AI" crap some people add to every comment that definitely makes bots not scrape the comment, of course!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Threads is trying to become that. We have a list of instances blocking Threads here: https://fedipact.veganism.social/

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminder that LW does not block Threads.net : https://lemmy.world/instances

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Has anyone even seen Threads content anywhere? I'm not blocking Threads on my instance either. Neither am I blocking Nazi instances. Not because I endorse either of those things. Just because I have never even seen them. Easy enough to rectify if they ever pop up.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Given how many users threads claims, I suspect threads members must be de facto limited to threads communities. Even if they can, technically, subscribe to regular lemmy communities, how would they discover them? "320 million" threads users vs 65,000? 100,000? lemmy users? And community search is going to be flooded with options from the platform with 2000x more users.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 week ago

I never see anything from threads anywhere… search results, cable news, etc. Who’s using it even?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago

Everything posted on the public web is potential AI training data, federation is completely irrelevant to that.

The rest of your questions has the simple answer that a priori there is nothing "stopping" any of that. You should choose an instance whose admins are looking out for things like that and keeping your experience enjoyable, banning spambots or defederating from spambot farms when they are discovered.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago

You can defederate from the corporate servers.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 15 points 1 week ago

We would find out. We would defederate them

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago

What is stopping corpos from scraping everyone's posts and stuff from the fediverse and train their AI?

Nothing. And they already have.

What's stopping them then, to create loads of not accounts and spam / disrupt smaller communities?

Moderation.

When an instances quality drops, the users may be more incentivised to migrate to bigger instances and go there.

Why would they do that when every instance has the same content?

Corpos can flood the fediverse with ads

I mean they can but no one would subscribe to them or share them, so no one would see them, so why would they bother making them?

about how certain countries behave. I feel the true evil are the corporates.

Sometimes the two are actually one in the same.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Like others pointed out defederation, but to add the important bit for normies (don't mean derogatory at all) is that it is not meant to be a less complicated or more efficient experience, it is meant to have more (or actual) freedom and democracy.

Much like with gov politics, you have to be active to some degree or a few people can control everything.

So yes, when defederation needs to happen or communities moved (for much of that additional tools will streamline the processes in the future I'm sure), it's a bit messy, but it doesn't rob you or feed the megacorps pushing the society into more inequality.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago

There's no economical incentive to join the fediverse for large corporations - at least not yet. I think it'll take another 5 years before that happens.

The !boycottusa@lemmy.ca and !buyeuropea@feddit.uk movements would have to become mainstream first, because let's be honest, the fediverse is the actual contender to US social media. Although, right now it's really fediverse vs bluesky. Once someone creates a reddit clone on top of bluesky, then the fediverse will lose that battle, because people are uncomfortable with choice.

[–] fernfrost@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well for the me reason there aren’t as many troll farms operating here in comparison to reddit. There are just not enough users here yet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden 9 points 1 week ago

Not much to do against scraping. On a small (but actively moderated) instance, a spamming bot will easily be detected and hopefully suspended. Generally, moderation is often better on smaller instances, so I'm not too worried about people migrating towards bigger instances - usually it's the other way round.

For 2. - dedicated corp instances will be defederated from many instances quickly. Bridge accounts on other instances need to be dealt with by the mods.

Yes, of course this can increase moderation effort. But spam accounts are way more easy to deal with from a moderation perspective than issues between real human users which usually takes wayyy more effort to deal with.

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The fact that corporations sees the fediverse as inconsequential. The minute people flood it in larger numbers as they are fleeing the corporate entshittified internet, that is exactly what they are going to do though.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
  1. Disruption: Probably ethics? I mean, I know big global businesses barely have any, but they do care about their reputation somewhat. Anyone running a botnet to destroy small/medium fediverse servers would be discovered fairly quickly, I suspect. Nothing is going to stop AI training scraping outside of regulation, I suspect.

  2. Ads are enshittification. Federation is defense against it, because it prevents vendor lock-in and allows migration while maintaining your network effect. Threads already tried to join, and nearly nothing of theirs gets through. I'm on a mainstream mastodon service that doesn't block threads, and I've seen a threads post only once or twice. Threads can't display their add on my service, so there's no incentive for them to push content.

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Nothing. Except that they don't give a shit. Fedi population is tiny and irrelevant.

Let me put it into perspective. Currently Fediverse as a whole has around 50k daily active users and 1.3m monthly active users split between multiple services with Mastodon being the most active. These are the stats for something that exists for over a decade.

I used to work in a company making some social media products. When we launched our main product we had 1m daily active users within a month and I don't remember how many monthly users (that was over 10 years ago). And it just grew from there.

Facebook Threads has 100m daily active users now. The whole Fediverse is a tiny echo chamber and no one cares or knows about its existence.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›