this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
65 points (98.5% liked)

Manga

921 readers
40 users here now

This community is for discussions related to manga.

Rules

Post Tags

Post tags are optional, but are recommended since some frontends can use them to categorize posts. Some recommended post tags:

Related communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

Right.... But child marriage? Still totally cool in Texas. Gotta protect the fictional children but not the real children.

[–] shani66@ani.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Same old story, just western chauvinism and puritanism. There's a reason piracy is the default for otaku, fansubbers are super stars, and it's bad news when a publisher pays attention to the world outside Japan.

My money is in this specifically being an attack on the queer community, btw. Anime is pretty queer coded (see yaoi, yuri, otokonoko, etc) and the queer community thrives in online spaces (especially in more regressive states like Texas), soooo make anime illegal under the classic bullshit of 'think of the children' (nonsense, btw, anyone who hides behind that is doing something horrific themselves). Bam, you hurt a bunch of innocent people and undermine art (also a classic fascist goal) for years to come.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Get ready for 25 to 50% of all Texas teenagers to become sex offenders

[–] Daze@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The legislation explicitly states that this applies “regardless of whether the depiction is an image of an actual child, a cartoon or animation, or an image created using an artificial intelligence application or other computer software.

Can this be argued without the preclusion of context of being "of a child"? Did these smegma crusts just ban all forms of media since the very beginning of use of computer assistance?

[–] CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RIP Funimation. They’re probably gonna have to move their HQ

[–] anonymous_in_atl@ani.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd be surprised if Sony wasn't already moving them to Cali

[–] CannedTuna@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

That’s right, Crunchyroll did buy them out and their HQ is in California.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

so its not even about sexualizing children, but even just containing children at all is forbidden now?

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bill, which seeks to amend Chapter 43 of the Texas Penal Code by adding Section 43.235, defines an offense as knowingly possessing, accessing with intent to view, or promoting obscene visual material containing a depiction that “appears to be of a child younger than 18 years of age engaging in activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B)“. The activities described by Section 43.21(a)(1)(B) refer to depictions of sexual conduct.

It really depends how broadly it's interpreted, but it is about sexual depictions of children.

Luckily, Texas is known for its reasonable interpretation of laws. /s

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

in that case it seems fine to me

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How far should we take this? If someone labels the drawing below with "age 17", is it time to call the cops?

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Ireland has had laws like this for years. Hasn’t killed the anime/manga market there.