this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
70 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

67050 readers
4525 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] realitista@lemm.ee 8 points 14 hours ago

With Tesla behind it, I'm sure it will happen and be an unmitigated disaster.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Clear the way for all those cars that won't be able to do shit in snow and rainy weather or if road situations are less than 99% clear!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Like the one tested by Mark Rober?

[–] rigamarole@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

The lidar one was pretty cool, imo. Tesla sucked.

[–] twocupsofsugar@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

I like the idea of self driving cars, especially for people with mobility issues but they'll never be safe enough for use without their own infrastructure because of the complexity and also terrible design of American roads. Personally I think its better to spend our tax dollars on building better public transit and human sized transportation methods but the absurd amount of push back from both the populace and also the government basically guarantees it isn't going to happen in my life time. But i generally don't see the self-driving car experiment working out in the long run.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully this will show the world that they are a bad idea. The price will be in blood, of course.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it would be great if the technology was more mature, and there was proper accountability for the negative consequences. I think we need a conservative approach npw, where the CEO of the companies pushing self driving are personally held liable for manslaughter if someone dies due to an error.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 21 hours ago

I don't believe either of those will happen.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep. Instead of a conservative approach to new technology the US uses a Conservative approach to new technology which means no regulation and costs born by the populace. No privacy, health outcomes, safety recalls...all to foster "innovation". We're basically just lab rats without rights and the now-being-actively-dismantled veneer of protections.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much this. Ever wonder how so many people got killed and mangled during the Industrial Revolution? You're about to find out.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

The triangle shirtwaist apparel by Gap. Travel the high seas on the Carnival Cruise Line Titanic. Discover employment opportunities and exciting diseases like pneumoniultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis in resurgent US coal industry. Enjoy being fired for not showing up for work because you got food poisoning since companies don't have FDA oversight anymore--and sick time was nationally forbidden. The future is bright, join now!

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 hours ago

Haha, with a capital C to be sure.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

This is further evidence that Agent Orange's mission is to sow chaos and discord, and to sabotage the government and economy.