this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
1066 points (99.3% liked)

Good News Everyone

1411 readers
423 users here now

A place to post good news and prevent doom scrolling!

Rules for now:

  1. posts must link from a reliable news source
  2. no reposts
  3. paywalled articles must be made available
  4. avoid politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Off topic, they look like detached homes. Was there a conscious choice not to make duplexes, quads, or an apartment building? Tiny homes are just so weird to me... People will really do anything except stick units next to each other

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If it was possible to build co-ops of these it'd be what I've been suggesting for like 9 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tacobellhop@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

My grandma lived in this trailer park for 40 years until she died. Pretty low overhead.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (14 children)

As for the residents of the houses, rent is kept at 30% of income, which means the large majority of residents pay a maximum of $200 — including all utilities and internet — every month.

How are they planning to sustain this long-term?

Surely, someone is paying for the difference. Unless I totally missed it from the article 🫣

[–] EchoCT@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's why the tech millionaire financing this isn't a tech billionaire.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I get that he's financing it, but that's not sustainable if you want to implement something similar around the country.

I love the idea, and the tiny house village looks amazing! But if it relies on a millionaire to voluntarily subsidize the project, I can't see it lasting too long.

Now, that brings us to a wonderful new option: tax the rich more than we do.

The top 5 billionaires could fund 1000s of these tiny home villages with just a fraction of a percent increase on their hoarded wealth.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

I love the idea, and the tiny house village looks amazing! But if it relies on a millionaire to voluntarily subsidize the project, I can't see it lasting too lang.

Which is why this needs to be a government task, and the rich shouldn't be begged for voluntary charity, they should be taxed.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly when I see "tech millionaire" and "altruism" in the same article, I don't expect to see someone actually using their wealth to do something decent.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Millionaires still have their humanity on occasion.

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When I lived in germany full time, I would've loved to live in a tiny home, but germany would've rather put me on the street than allow a tiny home lmaoo.

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That's the problem in a lot of the US too. We transitioned from building massive subdivisions of small/cheap homes to smalle subdivisions of larger/more expensive housing. This is due to a mix of zoning that favors single family detached housing, land availability, and consumer tastes.

Homes have drastically grown in size over the past 200 years while the number of people living in them has decreased. Not to mention nicer material, which also contributes to cost. No more "builder grade" cabinets and formica counters these days.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

This is good, but if we address this at a systemic level, we don't need to put people in tiny low-density homes unconnected to anything for it to be affordable.

China addresses it by looking at how much labor and materials is required and ensuring the price of concrete, steel, glass, etc is sufficiently low for the number of homes they need constructed, and that there is enough of each type of skilled labor that goes into building a home.

Presumably local governments have some mechanism for when they know a house costs X materials and Y labor, and they see new construction costing significantly more than that.

The result is detached homes@avg 75USD/sqft and apartments@55/sqft. With current interest rates of 6.768%, you'd get ~400 sqft homes with a $200/mo 30 year mortgage at those prices, 600sqft if interest rates were 3%.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Detached house construction in the US costs are closer to $150/SF.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Corigan@lemm.ee 169 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“The word ‘philanthropy’ is often interpreted as someone who gives money,” he told the alumni magazine.

“But the Greek roots of the word ‘philos’ and ‘anthropos’ mean to love humans. What I have discovered is spending money is the easy thing, spending yourself is the hard thing. The 12 Neighbours project is how I can best spend myself.”yl

I'm not crying, you're crying... Sniff

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I also liked this:

“We have people who have been run over by trauma, by substance abuse, by all of these things,” LeBrun told Macleans. “It’s about excavating that person, buried under their circumstances, little by little.”

Seems like a decent dude.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Remember, theres a gigantic difference between the wealth of a billionaire and the wealth of a millionaire. For one thing, its possible to make a million without harming others, a BILLION though, you HAVE to sacrifice others to achieve.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›