this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
17 points (87.0% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6975 readers
11 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I hate when people pretend that a owner owned and non- profit companies can never do any wrong.

If any company did something againest consumers, they should be boycotted till they fix their behavior or correct their mistakes.

It's like, one of the things I started seeing people giving a free pass for so long is paywalls and overflowing amount of trackers for news organizations.

I have no problem with companies that might provide some weekly or even monthly articles under a paywall, but paywalling every article is anti consumer. I also have no problem with companies that have a moderate amount of trackers, but I should not trade my soul to read articles, news websites need to choose carefully what to include on their websites.

If you gonna have all the trackers in the world, then at least raise the value of your product, for news that means license them under a free license(Creative Commons,...etc) so I actually get a article in exchange for allowing the trackers in your website. Otherwise, granting me a license to only look at the text in exchange is unfair.

I don't care what is the name of the company capitalist or not, paywalled content that restrict people ability to read is evil and ads that track the size of your underwear is evil and so the companies who do so need to be boycotted to change their behavior.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The ads based business model is deeply flawed and resulting in the ending of democracy. You need to pay, but the issue rn is the flawed nature of paying and digital currency. Subscriptions are garbage. I should be able to pay for only the product I am interested in and then the value should be on par with the past.

A newspaper was pocket change and most of that was for materials and labor involved with the physical medium. You were only paying a few cents for all of the actual content of the newspaper.

Likewise now, I should be able to use something like monero to pay $0.05 to see and read any article. I don't get to save it or rights to it or whatnot. I can screenshot it for my personal use or just pay again to see it next time. This should have no tracking whatsoever, no subscription, no login, no fingerprinting. It is a straight forward transaction for a product at a fair price. No institution has a right to be a lazy burden with some repeating subscription. If they cannot churn value on this type of market, they don't belong in the business in the first place.

All ads are existing in a market where the base transactions are often valued in tiny fractions of a cent, yet when that same product is presented to the public it is orders of magnitude more expensive. This is criminal market manipulation. I should be valued the same as a stalkerware data victim viewing a page as I am when paying for the same view/impression. The right to pay my way out of digital slavery and extortion markets costs orders of magnitude more than the privateers pay for the means to extort and manipulate me. That is a gross violation of fundamental human rights. The consequence of decades of this disparity has been the erosion of all reliable media sources. This was a decades long soft coup on democracy and it has been very successful. A well informed and balanced citizen is the foundation of democracy.

[–] MrZee@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

“Worker owned and non profit companies should have a free pass to be anti-consumer,” sounds like the less popular opinion to me.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I think it's sad that people have adopted the identity "consumer". I will never accept that markets and cash are the same thing as political consciousness or direct action.

We know that cash shouldn't count as political agency for the rich, why do we accept that for ourselves?

[–] RaptorBenn@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

3rd paragraph gave me a brain hemorrhage, read your work before you post.