175
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago

Good. I wish more people knew what a negative externality was. This isn’t government interference. It’s making the market work more efficiently by accounting for the true costs of big vehicles.

[-] LongbottomLeaf@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 year ago

A new sedan that weighs 5,700 pounds would carry with it a maximum fee of $6.40. On the higher end, for light trucks or SUVs that weigh up between 8,500 and 9,499 pounds, the new fees would reach nearly $30. Commercial vehicles would be exempt from the measure.

That's not as much as I was expecting.

[-] tomatobeard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yep, should be much more to provide incentive for purchasing smaller vehicles

[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

What sedan weighs almost 6000 lbs? My Elantra weighs almost 3000. Can't imagine a full-size sedan is double the weight?

[-] Weylandyuta@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Probably something like my Kia niro. It's a hatchback/small SUV but it is a battery phev.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

A quick search tells me the Niro PHEV weighs about 3300 pounds. Meantime, my Bolt EUV (similar size BEV) tops out around 3700.

[-] Weylandyuta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No shit? I thought it was much heavier than that with the battery. Thanks for the update.

[-] angrymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Classic US. It's unsafe, would we prohibit? Noooo, muh freedom, we would only allow rich to buy.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
175 points (97.8% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

314 readers
2 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS