The headline is a bit misleading, as if this is a failure or there was an expectation that the rocket would NOT crash. On the contrary. NO space programme in the world has ever managed to ensure that the first test rocket did not crash. The flight time of 18 seconds is also significantly longer than the first SpaceX rocket, for example. The spokesperson from the company "Isar Aerospace" therefore also - rightly - described the launch as a "great success".
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)
Spaceflight
917 readers
35 users here now
Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.
All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).
Other related space communities:
- !rocketlab@lemmy.nz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !spacex@sh.itjust.works
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !militaryspace@sh.itjust.works
- !space@lemmy.world
Related meme community:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, it lifted off and didn't destroy the pad. For a first launch, I'd say that's pretty good!
Edit:
The flight time of 18 seconds is also significantly longer than the first SpaceX rocket, for example
Spectrum's first flight is actually pretty similar to the first Falcon 1 flight, and even exhibited a similar failure mode:
The vehicle had a noticeable rolling motion after liftoff, as shown on the launch video, rocking back and forth a bit, and then at T+26 seconds rapidly pitched over.
Agreed. They achieved some milestones. Filling, ignition, launch, clearing the pad. But Max Q, MECO, stage separation, anything related to the 2nd stage...
Baby steps... We didn't shoot for the moon on our first launch.