this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

Marvel Studios

3435 readers
66 users here now

Lemmy


Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios.

This community is a place to discuss, share and generally have fun with all things Marvel Studios.


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Community Guidelines

  1. Be constructive. As a community this is place for discussion, things you liked, things you didn't like, any everything in between. Low effort comments don't add to the discussion.
  2. Be civil. Disagreements happen. Don't attack others. Take a moment and reconsider before you post an inflammatory comment in all caps.
  3. No spam. Please don't post spam, trolling or other low effort content. If you're a human and you saw something interesting or had an interesting thought, you're probably fine.
  4. Memes are allowed. We're a small community, feel free to post memes or similar content. Funny things are good. If it becomes a problem we can discuss changing the rules.

In addition like any community we follow the Lemmy.World content policy rules. In short, don't attack people or groups.


Spoiler Guidelines

When should something no longer be considered a spoiler? In general use your best judgement. If want something more specific,


Related Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Microw@lemm.ee 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Marvel can not use the character in any movie without Sony's approval. That also includes a potential appearance in a Spider-Man movie.

But Sony could always say "yes good idea lets do this!'

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

But that would mean for Sony to actually make a good or even a decent movie and they do not like that.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Nah, the Marvel Spiderman movies with Tom Holland could feature Kingpin if Sony allows that. No need for Sony to have creative control

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically Spider-verse is Sony and those are excellent films.

However for live action I completely agree they are duds.

[–] ogeist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

That is 100% correct, but don't let them know that. The Spiderverse movies are moving slowly into production hell already :(

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Hulk/Kingpin TV show when?

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

I wish Spiderman could appear in Daredevil

[–] FASAIblogger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What if purposefully not calling him "Kingpin" nor "Wilson Fisk", like Arnold's Kalidor was Conan all but in name (same Arnold actor, same hair, same speech, etc)? Would that work? The word "likenesses" is not included is it? And likenesses, IP, and trademark are still owned by Marvel after all?

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Damn you Sony!

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How does that make sense? Did Fox need permission from Sony to use Fisk in the Affleck Daredevil film?

Also, he learned about season 2 at the same time as us because there was nothing to shoot. Season one was supposed to be 22(?) episodes but got rejiggered to two 9 episode seasons.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The article doesn't specifically name Sony, but since it's probably them, I wonder if it's a situation similar to Wanda & Pietro Maximoff?

Based on my reading elsewhere "New Regency" was the last company to hold the Daredevil rights (distributed by Fox), but those reverted to Marvel in 2015.

So the 2003 Daredevil film could use Wilson Fisk as a Daredevil character, but can't reference Spider-Man. And the 2002 Spider-Man film could have used Wilson Fisk, but can't reference Daredevil.

Just like Wanda & Pietro, they are "Avengers" characters, but we couldn't call them "mutants". Similarly the Fox X-Men could use Pietro as a "mutant", but not as an "Avenger".

If that's true then technically they could probably make a Daredevil film with Fisk as the villain, but they can't talk about Spider-Man. Unless there was something special in the revert to Marvel in 2015 that left live action film right for Daredevil exclusively with Sony.

We've seen Daredevil in live action film, but to be fair that was a Sony Spider-Man film. So it may loop around to not happening, unless Sony says yes. Which, if we assume the newly announced Spider-Man is a planned trilogy, I fully expect Sony to agree to having Daredevil & Spider-Man team up to take on Fisk in Spider-Man 5 or 6.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ah I see. So… I would think Sony could use their own version of King Pin (They did in In To The Spider-verse), but the version in Daredevil belongs to Marvel.

But… couldn’t using King Pin in the next Spider-Man film satisfy the condition that all the Spider-Man films need another MCU character?

I dunno, it just seems to me that if Fox already put King Pin in a movie that Marvel would now be able to too, but being in a Spider-Man movie would require co-operation with Sony.

I’m thinking he’s saying this to throw us off the trail of a project he’s already working on.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect the MCU Spider-Man is a special case.

While legally Sony can use Tom Holland Spider-Man whenever and wherever they want, see Morbius post-credit where Vulture appears and says "I think it has something to do with Spider-Man" or Venom 2 post-credits where Venom jumps into the MCU and sees Spider-Man.

I suspect they won't actually jeopardize the Sony-Marvel/Disney relationship by actually using him, unless the two companies agree to use them (and associated properties) together.

I think Sony COULD introduce a new Kingpin, but they want to leave that position open for a deal with Marvel/Disney.

I think Marvel also could probably put Kingpin in a film, but doing so without Sony slightly jeopardizes future deals with Sony.

I also agree there are probably rumors of a future Sony deal, so this is a misdirect. (Although he might not actually have any insider knowledge.)

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

He might not actually know all the details too. We’re nerds who scrounge the internet for clues. Who owns the rights to what may not be that interesting to him and isn’t really necessary to do his job.

I work as a freelancer doing corporate AV. I know who I work for, but I often have no idea what the job is until the day before or so, and honestly I don’t care. :)

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

has sony even released a superhero movie in the last 20 years?

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

has sony even released a superhero movie in the last 20 years?

  • Spider-Man 3 (2007)
  • The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
  • The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)
  • Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)
  • Venom (2018)
  • Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018)
  • Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019)
  • Venom: Let There Be Carnage (2021)
  • Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021)
  • Morbius (2022)
  • Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023)
  • Madame Web (2024)
  • Venom: The Last Dance (2024)
  • Kraven the Hunter (2024)