this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
797 points (97.3% liked)

Science Memes

14533 readers
2636 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 73 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The teeth on the rabbit skull don't match up with the picture of what aliens would picture. They might misinterpret some things but not the obvious characteristics.

[–] 6mementomorib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

do you think someone just actually whipped up a 3d model just for a meme?

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

That would be dishonest, I'm pretty sure they sourced that from aliens.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 20 points 2 weeks ago

The hind legs also have the joints in proportionally the wrong places compared to the skeleton. I reckon they gave it to the intern to reconstruct, and they just hastily banged it out last thing on a Friday afternoon after a liquid lunch.

The whole body doesn't match. Those must be some stupid-ass aliens.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 13 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's just jabbing at our early assumptions about dinosaurs seemingly lacking much in the way of bulk. We used to interpret them as these ultra-skinny weirdly mummified looking things rather than the plumper creatures many of them probably were.

The idea is that aliens find skeletons of animals we're more familiar with and come to the same kind of wildly mistaken conclusions about them that we might have if we'd found rabbit skeletons without having first hand experience of modern rabbits.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Everyone knows aliens cannot make mistakes.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the Lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Best deus ex machina ever!

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Machina ex deus, technically.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Best Machina ex deus ever! (then)

[–] rikudou 50 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was in a dinopark recently and there were some bone replicas, footprints etc. and I was constantly like "how the hell didn't the scientists see that it's just a giant chicken?"

Some of it is extremely obvious.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only scientifically accurate scene in Jurassic Park has a little boy say the velociraptor looks like a turkey. They knew dinosaurs were chickens, they just didn't bother showing us in movies.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They retconned Jurassic park saying the skin was like that because of the genes they had to splice up in order to bring them back to life.

[–] bramkaandorp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not that weird, considering they already had that in the original movie. Frog DNA.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lagomorph sounds way cooler than it is too.

[–] SquirrelX@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Has anyone actually tried representing dinosaurs like fluffy (or very feathery) animals?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A 15' chicken with teeth would be terrifying.

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The common art keeps giving them long feathers on their arms but I would have assumed long feathers only evolved on flying birds and most of the feathers on the flightless dinosaurs would be pretty uniform.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've also come across these. There's a lot we don't know, all of these could be entirely wrong.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes we might never really know. It is part of the mystery. Can you imagine if you had dinosaurs that had trunks like elephants?

[–] tauren@lemm.ee 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SquirrelX@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Most dinosaur recreations now just go "what would a bird with this skeleton look like?"

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

unfortunately a lot of art just sorta glues a bunch of feathers to a deinonychus and calls it a velociraptor, but here's some stuff i feel makes more sense.
(Also side note: t.rex probably was actually mostly naked, however it was likely skin rather than scales, like a giant plucked monster turkey, which IMO is significantly worse.)

more images






[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I always wondered What if all dinosaurs were big furry balls with large ears...

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

We're pretty sure now that they were more similar to birbs with proto feathers acting as fur. So many of them probably would be puff balls. Although it was also hotter back then.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Love me some shrink wrap in my paleo art. The ones depicting baboons are especially nightmarish.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hippos are mine.

[–] GoodLuckToFriends@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't realize rabbits had such long tailbones.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] El_Scapacabra@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's got a vicious streak a mile wide!

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

Look at the bones!

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck me the baboon image was serious nightmare fuel.

Can you imagine if we somehow were able to get 100% accurate images of dinosaurs (with the feathers... they were birds, not reptiles, and warm blooded, too) and the T-rex chirped and kinda looked like a giant chicken?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine aliens finding earth a few centuries after we kill ourselves through climate change and war, they find a human skeleton but mix up a bunch of bones with dogs and cats, and they also believed we had feathers.