The difference is in the endorsement of horrible behaviour. So, if the same horrible things were encouraged in an LGBTQ+ book, I would expect it to get the same response as what the bible is getting.
bramkaandorp
joined 2 years ago
The in-universe reason is that the devil is making people think that the criticism is valid.
Tempting is what they call it, and it allows them to dismiss anyone who appears to be making a good point as consorting with the devil.
Which is, I think, why people were quick to claim that the killer was trans.
Good catch!
Wait, I chose no violence, but it will still come my way?
Now they're just saying the quiet part out loud.
Again.
Only a little though.
I personally think he is highly overrated, but if you think of him as an airport thriller writer, who has no real intention to be accurate in his depiction of things in his books, you'd rate him fairly.
Sure, but their nails aren't typically as sharp as cats' claws, so there is that.
Tell that to his sister Rosemary.
Reichy Reich springs to mind.
view more: next ›
Oh, don't get me wrong, I also don't think the bible should be censored. It's just that the bible does endorse bad behaviour, such as how to treat slaves (and thus owning slaves). It is not just a piece of fiction that nobody believes in, and it wasn't written by people who just wanted to entertain their friends. A lot of the bible is about morality.