Conservative

73 readers

104 users here now

A community for some conservative points of view.

🍃🌻 Rule 1: Kindly be empathetic and kind to others. Trolling and spamming will not be tolerated. Making the community a friendly & supportive place is our goal.

All of us are here for a short lifetime. Let’s have a nice time here and avoid negativity. :)

Please be respectful, even if you don't agree.

Don't personally attack people. Don't call them names.

Be grown-ups.

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

DonaldJMusk@lemmy.today

-17

Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen ripped apart for admitting his trip to El Salvador was paid for by taxpayers (www.dailymail.co.uk)

submitted 1 day ago by WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol to c/conservative@lemmy.today

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Ripped apart" by fascists who are fine with illegal abductions and suspension of due process. So, no one worth listening to.

The real scandal is these violations of the Constitution by this admin are being paid for by taxpayers.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Guess the democrats should have picked a better candidate and ran a better campaign then. Cuz taxpayers voted for Trump.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The majority of voters did not vote for Donny Dipshit, actually.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really? How'd he become president? He won the popular vote and he won the electoral vote. And the democrats refuse to change eh electoral vote system. So...oh well...

Guess your party isn't really looking out for you after all.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just throw things out there without understanding what conversation you're even in, don't ya?

He got a plurality, not a majority. And at what point were Democrats able to restructure the electoral process? Who the fuck was even talking about that?

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

lol Riiiggghht. Enjoy the cope. I guess democrats only when by plurality too. Right?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You don't understand what words mean, do you? Biden had a majority. Obama had a majority. Trump has never had a majority of voters vote for him. He claims he had a popular mandate but he doesn't. It's weird you're still backing him as he personally makes sure our economy implodes as he takes bribes.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I understand the words from FactCheck and Wikipedia: Donald Trump won the popular vote in the 2024 U.S. presidential election. He received approximately 77.3 million votes (49.8%), while Kamala Harris garnered about 75 million votes (48.3%)

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/11/trump-won-the-popular-vote-contrary-to-claims-online/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

Let me guess what your next comment is tho: "They are part of the propaganda campaign!" Right?! lmao

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for confirming that you don't understand what I said.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for confirming that I'm right.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You understand that 49.3% is not a majority, right? Of course you don't. You posted the numbers yourself. Try to keep up.

[–] WilliamFBuckley@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago

I posted links that said he won the majority. Bottom line: He's prez. Your party lost. Accept it. :)