In case anyone doesn't want to read, the current pattern is
<number><letter x3><number x3>
They are just going to start again reversed, so
<number x3><letter x3><number>.
Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.
Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.
Related Communities:
Nearby Communities:
In case anyone doesn't want to read, the current pattern is
<number><letter x3><number x3>
They are just going to start again reversed, so
<number x3><letter x3><number>.
Maybe this is just the computer engineer in me but a new numbering protocol that does not at least 10x the capacity of the previous one doesn't seem like an improvement.
The current one had a 45 year shelf life. This new system should last a good long while.
You misunderstand. We must plan for the possibility that the population of California will reach 1 billion within the next few years and that each person should be able to register at least 10 cars, just to be safe.
Still think they should have gone to A123ABC instead but I guess it's fine.
UNICODE
The plan: add a digit?
How easy that is depends on how deep the 7-digit format is embedded in however many lines of dusty COBOL spread out over whatever systems grew from, and are dependent on, the original.