this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
32 points (92.1% liked)

Understand USA

2 readers
93 users here now

"Crisis in Understanding in USA"
"Manchurian Population"
"People keep saying they do not understand how it is possible"
"Understanding the Crisis in Understanding"

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 

Reddit comment mofowym

"Why are trans people in every government’s agenda now? And not for the good. It’s how much? 0.1% of the population? Just leave them be! Why no one seems willing to tackle cost of living, housing, or healthcare? Is our society really as doomed as it seems?"

https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1k56wgz/keir_starmer_does_not_believe_trans_women_are/mofowym/

 

"Why are trans people in every government’s agenda now?"

ANSWER "Operation Matthew 4:19"

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/12/vladimir-putin-conservative-icon/282572/

"Vladimir Putin, Conservative Icon"
"The Russian president is positioning himself as the world's leading defender of traditional values."
By Brian Whitmore
December 20, 2013

"Vladimir Putin is calling on the conservatives of the world to unite—behind him."

The Kremlin leader's full-throated defense of Russia's "traditional values" and his derision of the West's "genderless and infertile" liberalism in his annual state-of-the-nation address last week was just the latest example of Putin attempting to place himself at the vanguard of a new "Conservative International."

The speech came on the heels of the appointment of Dmitry Kiselyov—the television anchor who has said the hearts of gays and lesbians who die should be buried or burned—as head of the new Kremlin-run media conglomerate Rossia Segodnya.

And just days before Putin's address, the Center for Strategic Communications, an influential Kremlin-connected think tank, held a press conference in Moscow to announce its latest report. The title: "Putin: World Conservatism's New Leader."

MORE: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/12/vladimir-putin-conservative-icon/282572/

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 32 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I have been told that this is part of the fascist playbook.

Find a marginalized community and destroy them under any pretext you can generate.

Start with something else, find one that'll put up the least amount of resistance, the one that will generate the least amount of sympathy, one that everyone who has the smallest calcium-deposit of decency in their body will hate.

Start with pedophiles, because you know and everyone knows pedophiles deserve to get murdered, right?

Then associate your marginalized community with the community that you destroyed. Start screaming from every media outlet that trans people are pedophiles. That they will invade bathrooms to rape children.

Then branch out to your next target. Go after the gays. Keep ramping up the intensity.

Go after people who have had an abortion or who provide abortions.

Go after people who have married other races.

Make all of these actions a crime so that you can arrest and disenfranchise the people using the legal platforms of the country.

Good, upstanding people don't want to be criminals, so they will do their best to not participate in the actions that you have disenfranchised.

As long as civil war does not break out and cause your regime to be overthrown, you are guaranteed success.

If a civil war does break out, all you have to do is use the overwhelming power of your military to defeat them, and then claim every single person that rebelled against your tyranny were actually the tyrannists.

Use previous instances of civil war as evidence that you were in the right and they are in the wrong just like it was 150 years ago.

Ignore the fact that the first civil war was about ending slavery even though the second civil war will be about reinstituting slavery.

Rinse and repeat, continuously increasing the pressure until eventually you achieve your goal of picking your own race and economic political class as the supreme race and everyone else is disadvantaged.

The best part is, is that by and large, the people who are close to your ideal group of people will support you all the way up until you turn the thumbscrews on them.

And then they will say, "How did this happen? I don't understand why you would turn on me."

But nobody will be there to save them.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

People in general aren't all that bright and are easily distracted by wedge issues. Trans rights conveniently distract everyone on both sides from our leaders' overall corruption and failure to address larger existential crises like climate change and massive wealth inequality.

[–] RoundSparrow@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

People in general aren’t all that bright and are easily distracted by wedge issues.

I find it's become incredibly popular on social machine systems to say: every other person is dumb and stupid, I'm inside my artificial reality and everyone else is not very bright. This all started in March 2013 that this pattern of egoism began to surge and increase on social media populations. !MasturbatoryEgoism@lemm.ee

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously I didn't mean you. You're too smart to be caught up in the "I'm smarter than you" fads.

[–] RoundSparrow@lemm.ee -1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Obviously I didn’t mean you. You’re too smart to be caught up in the “I’m smarter than you” fads.

I think you are insincere and here doing active measures to promote ignorance and self-centered values of Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Vlad Putin / Kremlin's December 2013 "Conservative International Party" values, etc.

 

::: ______________
"As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think. What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism." ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 !BackTo1985@lemm.ee