this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1239 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

6843 readers
1758 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Remember the stimulus checks that covered approximately 15 days' worth of rent?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 10 points 14 hours ago

Remember? I'm still living off of mine!

Oh wait, that was just some right wing delusional bullshit that disappeared as quickly as it materialized.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (9 children)

According to my halfassed search engine results, giving birth costs on average $18,000.

Just the cost of epidural, estimates range from $1000 to $3500 out of that cost.

[–] Nefara@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I had a kid three years ago, we decided to get a higher premium health plan that specifically had excellent natal coverage. It's one of the most expensive plans available to us but we didn't pay anything for 9 months worth of prenatal visits plus 3 days in the hospital. The coverage statement said that delivery from the hospital was something like $28,000 but the first bill we actually saw that we had to pay was for a hearing test that was only partially covered.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Why only after the baby is born? Is there something significant about the moment of birth or something?

[–] JollyBrancher@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Aye. Try and convict them as an adult and then they're free labor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Isn’t it like ~$310,000 to raise a kid to 17? That’s, what, 2% of what is needed after the poor child is born? And some woman is going to decide to let a guy nut in her for $5000?

[–] yourgodlucifer@sh.itjust.works 13 points 15 hours ago

This won't even cover the medical costs to give birth

[–] ace_of_based@sh.itjust.works 10 points 16 hours ago

Even Elon pays better than this

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 14 hours ago

More ineffective Band-Aids.

The core issues never get addressed. Prices keep going up.

And those issues will get worse under a corpo like Trump.

[–] griff 17 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

“White babies only please” —Cheetolini

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

I know you were half joking but for everyone else here complaining that 5k ain't shit (I agree, it's not), it's because the incentive is not for you. It's for rich people (read: rich white people, since poverty disproportionately affects non-white people).

5k might not mean shit to you in trying to raise a child but for someone who already has the means to have/raise a kid, it's actually bonus money. That's the incentive.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Have 4 kids.

5k is couch money when you have kids. It'll maybe take care of a few months of daycare. Now if you're on gov assistance and make next to nothing? This will be great, but don't expect to get a job or climb out of poverty with 5k. A kid will eat that up super fast.

[–] dangling_cat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Well, in a couple of years, some countries more than 50% of the population will be retired. Even a perfect democracy would not pass a law to improve young people’s lives so they can have time and money to have kids.

Just like in a perfect democracy, no affordable housing law will be approved because 66% of the population are homeowners.

Its unsolvable.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I sometimes joke with my kids and call them Lamborghini 1 and 2, because that's how much money it was suggested you would need for each kid, and I'm sure that has doubled or tripled by now.

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Are these those welfare babies Republicans always screeeched about?

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As an atheist baby-eater, sign me up. I could have a lovely dinner party for $5K on Hallowen every year and not have to find a main course.

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That's the only way anyone would financially benefit from this bill. Infanticide. And only if they do a home birth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scala@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

Add an extra zero to that. Then we might consider

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 4 points 14 hours ago

I mean I like the direction, but this is far cry from other countries.

Give us UHC, improve working rights, guaranteed housing for parents, daycare.

But Its good they at least bringing it up.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

Putin did the same thing, he aware 16k equivalent for having 10+ children .

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

instead of DEPENDING on GOVERNMENT HANDOUTS new parents should be GRATEFUL someone is WILLING to be GENEROUS and provide them with such GOODWILL. America is WINNING again under PRESIDENT TRUMP

@BigMacHole@lemm.ee am I doing it right?

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 12 hours ago

Let them get braces.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

as always, trump's face is in it.

they should have plated the purse in gold to complete the package.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›