this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
446 points (99.6% liked)

Europe

5760 readers
1180 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

In January 2023, the Dutch city of The Hague introduced a first-of-its-kind municipal ordinance banning advertisements for fossil fuels, fossil-powered transport, and the aviation sector in all public spaces, including bus stops, billboards, and other outdoor media platforms managed by the city.

[...]

Shortly after its introduction, the ordinance was challenged by travel companies which argued that the ban was too broad and restricted their commercial interests.

However, in April 2024, a Dutch court ruled that the city of The Hague acted lawfully in introducing the ban. The court recognized the city’s right β€” and responsibility β€” to protect public health and the environment, especially in the context of the climate crisis. This ruling not only safeguards the fossil ad ban but also sets a legal precedent for other cities worldwide to follow.

[...]

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Why the hell do fossil fuel companies even need to advertise?

They don't offer anything unique, fuel is fuel. If it's for home heating or electricity I do t exactly have a choice in who provides It.

If it's gas for a vehicle I'm choosing whoever is closest when I need gas because everyone is always magocally the exact same price everywhere.

How does advertising even benefit them at all?

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 7 points 21 hours ago

Greenwashing.

I am Dutch and all Shell adds I have seen is about how much they are moving into green technology.

Yet, during a share holders meeting they proudly state they will not do that and invest more in oil because 'the oil market still saw growth.'

Or that the green investments is mostly into hydrogen, so that they can continue with their production scarcity nonsense.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Propaganda is a powerful manipulator. Design/ad budgets change how people think about things. Fossil fuel companies should absolutely not be allowed to spend money on ads: that money should go toward climate repititions.

[–] MBM 1 points 22 hours ago

fossil fuels, fossil-powered transport, and the aviation sector in all public spaces

I think this includes ads for non-electric cars, which is huge. Flights too.

[–] dumnezero@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago

banning advertisements for fossil fuels, fossil-powered transport, and the aviation sector

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope they do this in the whole country, we're already getting bombarded enough with those commercials on TV. Don't need constant reminders about cheap airline tickets on the street...

And internet, where they keep paying "influencers" to repeat oil and gas talking points.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does this really set legal precedent for cities outside the Netherlands like the article suggests?

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 24 points 1 day ago

Yes. Not precedent as in American law where "they've done it this way in the past so we don't need to think about it again and just copy the previous ruling" but precedent as in other cities have now seen a) it can be done b) how to do it. This makes it easier to do it in their cities. It's also in a highly influential city when it comes to laws and courts.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

legal precedent

This term has quite different meanings, depending where you are.

[–] shekau@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

😍😍😍

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does this extend to ads for public transport?

[–] oo1 2 points 20 hours ago

Adverts for public transport? Makes about as much sense as adverts for fossil fuel - I guess. I don't recall ever seing one where I live though.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dutch Railways have fully run on green energy since 2017. AFAIK there are no other train companies running on diesel anymore either. Buses are getting electrified, albeit slowly.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes there are trains running on diesel in the Netherlands. Especially in the border areas

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But NS (= Dutch Railways) doesn't right?

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Edit: I misinterpreted your comment.

No, NS doesn't run diesel trains anymore.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not my comment but I figured. I wonder though about the original question; where do they draw the line. So no ads for airplanes and gas stations, obvious, but how about some plastic lunch box or a bus company? What about train tickets where a part of the trip is with a diesel train. Surely the city will not allow something that is questionable at some point.

It’s specifically for fossil fuel companies (so shell, BP etc.), aviation and other fossil fuel powered transportation.