this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
276 points (97.6% liked)

World News

47596 readers
2963 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 191 points 1 month ago (85 children)

You got to get rid of those nazis or they'll be ruling the roost in an election cycle, trust me. --an american

load more comments (85 replies)
[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 80 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If it was the other way around he'd never let Carney hear the end of it - "Carney, the guy who had to get someone else to quit in order to keep his seat".

Politicians gonna politics, no surprise there.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago

He already didn't let Carney hear the end of it - "Carney, who was not elected..."

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So I'm guessing Alberta is Canada's version of Alabama?

[–] zippaling@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Probably closer to Texas, since we have a bunch of oil.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arankays@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 month ago

milhouse is a fucking snake and a con-artist.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are there not residency requirements?

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago

My riding decided to elect someone who lives two cities away, so I guess not at the local level at least

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Man that seems so Twisted to me. How can you represent people you don't spend any time around? How can you claim to know their needs if you don't even live among them?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

IDK anything about Canadian politics.

Didn't this guy just preside over a pretty epic loss? Why does his party still want him?

Similar thing just happened here in Australia. Leader of the party lost his seat. Even if he hadn't he would probably resign in shame because he's really made a mess of things.

[–] eurisko@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We have experienced a very strange situation where the cons (unfortunately) fared far better than it ever did in its modern iteration while losing its momentous advantage, meaning that there is still somewhat of a reason for Poilièvre to stay in the race. He is also very arrogant, so he will not back down easily.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Imagine if he fails to be elected again in the partials

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

82% in favour of conservatives during the last election but Carney can wait 6 months to launch the by-election, that might be long enough to piss off some conservatives that might want to get rid of PP.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

He'll win, the only reason he's coming to Alberta is because it's a slam dunk.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Nothing says democracy like ignoring the will of the people.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 month ago

that was predictable

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Appalling, craven, cowardly, and pathetic hubris on the part of PeePee and conservative sycophants. A deep shame on rural Alberta for being such uncritical lemmings.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They haven't voted yet. I, for one, am not holding my breath, but maybe there will be a silver lining of hope that he doesn't get elected, especially if an independent runs against him. Now, to get the independent candidate riled up and in place. I have a vivid imagination. Lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Bonifratz@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Actual beta male

[–] pepperjohnson@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

What a chud

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Is it within parliamentary procedure to address him as the former member from Ottawa-Carleton?

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

American here. Can someone explain why Carney won't be seeking NDP support?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

To form an alliance you mean? The Bloc Quebecois already said they'll be quiet for the next year as there's lots to do, having two parties to work with means you don't necessarily need to always bend the same way so it's advantageous to leave the door open to sometimes compromise left and sometimes compromise in favour of what Quebec wants...

[–] Xhead 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Political parties should just standby the morals and principles they try to uphold.

If they align together, great they can both vote yes. If they don't then they don't. Pandering to other parties to get their vote just gets in the way of what you are actually trying to achieve.

That's my take anyways

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Nobody respects you Milhouse

load more comments
view more: next ›