this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1225 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

8020 readers
2922 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MumboJumbo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Even looking at this selfishly, those kids are going to be adults, members of society. The better we set them up for success, the better our communities can be. This has got to be one of the cheapest investments in fighting crime and poverty.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The school to prison pipeline starts with making kids feel hopeless.

There is a reason why Trump and his fellow traitors are investing in third party prison administration.

No. Don't look at actual state prisons ... not those. They are investing in fast setup detention facilities, presumably for ICE. Doesn't Trump seem way too interested in prisons all of a sudden?

[–] abstrusedilemma@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ain't it funny how the factory doors close

Around the time that school doors close

Around the time that a hundred thousand jail cells

Open up to greet you like the reaper

[–] Aux@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If kids are hungry at school, that means they haven't earned their food yet.

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great argument for lowering the age limit for work on kids, amirite?

load more comments (1 replies)

If they worked in the mines, they could at least afford lunch.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 187 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I have a friend who is wealthy, well off, and a retired school teacher ..... who still argues that we shouldn't subsidize free food in schools for children.

She argues that it's the parents responsibility to feed their children.

I asked her as a teacher what she would rather prefer .. a classroom where you know every child is not thinking about their hunger ... or a class where you know several kids don't want to be there because they're hungry

She still insisted it's the parents responsibility

Fuck I hate conservatives

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She still insisted it’s the parents responsibility

Ok... and when the parents fail in that responsibility, we punish the children?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

The sins of the father are visited upon the children and all that

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what was their genius solution to if the child's parents are shit? Remove even more of their support systems and leave them to die?

Sure love when innocent children are forced to pay the consequences of their parent's choices. Very ethical

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In my experience, these personal responsibility types just don't care. The children die, the parents go to jail, and this is justice because the slothful get their just desserts or something.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just don't get how someone can reconcile the belief that "children should suffer"

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oh, that's easy. They think those children deserve it, because they'll be like their parents.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They fail understand the importance. It is sad. And you're spot on. We shouldn't punish children for their parents shortcomings.

I know I don't have to tell you this. But for those that haven't experienced it from childhood.

I'm from a country with free school lunch. And I can assure anyone that it's so much more, than just the food. In the lunch room, everyone is an equal. Our teacher also ate with us. Same place. Same food. Same tables.

Everyone is an equal. It matters. That way you don't get people who grow up thinking they're above the rest.

It transcends into adulthood and your work life. Bosses, CEOs, managers, employees, engineers, sales, janitors, IT, etc. It's not uncommon at all that they all share a table at lunch. As equals.

Your teacher, your boss, they're not Mr. Andersson, Professor Lundqvist, Doctor Hansen. They're just Robin, Emma, Karl, Billy. And I sincerely believe, that all starts in school.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

They fail at empathy as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KaRunChiy@fedia.io 116 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Conservitism is the mindset of the selfish

[–] grue@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Worse than that, it's the mindset of the short-sighted. These fucking morons wouldn't acknowledge the concept of government spending with a positive ROI even if you waterboarded them with Tang.

They'd rather create a shithole country where they have to cower inside gated communities to protect themselves from the impoverished masses instead of one where everybody is educated and prosperous, even though they themselves would be wealthier in the second case, just because they think everything is a zero-sum game and they can't win unless everybody else loses.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 days ago

The worst part of their mentality is that their wealth is based on taking advantage of others around them. They and their wealth wouldn't exist if not for the work and effort or coercion or abuse of others around them. They believe that they deserve their wealth because it came to them through their own personal effort alone. It's bad enough that they took advantage of others .... it's far worse to never acknowledge your role in having taken advantage of others.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago

It's just myopic emotions. "Does this feel good for me right now?" If it's actually good, if it's good long term, if it contradicts a past stance - none of that matters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

My mom married a rich guy when I was 11. That got us kicked off the free lunch programs, and the clothing closet.

So I didn’t eat breakfast or lunch from about 7th grade on. I’d get dizzy by the end of the day. It was the worst on days where I already felt a little sick.

I still have severely disordered eating.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like, it is the parents responsibility. It's something that must happen and it's their job.

If they're not fulfilling their responsibilities you don't just let it not happen though, that's not how a functional society works. You make sure what needs to get done gets done, and then you act like a member of a society and figure out why they're having trouble and what you can do to help.

You might, if you're feeling extra civic minded, offer food to any kid who wants it and leave the concern and extra assistance to people having trouble with home nutrition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Next time just tell her nope actually Jesus said it’s YOUR responsibility.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ask them if they'd rather pay for the child to be taken in to care.

Because like $3 a day of food is a fuck of a lot cheaper than actually taking responsibility for them by removing them from an unsuitable home.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

This is the "public vs private healthcare" debate all over again. You can draw a diagram with crayons proving without a doubt that free public healthcare is cheaper than having to pay higher premiums because poor people use the ER as their primary care and then skip out on the bills, and they still won't get it, because they've been so propagandized by late-stage Capitalism that they actually believe "what's good for the billionaire is good for me."

I've had these arguments countless times with people. Here's how it goes every single time:

Them: "Why should I have to pay an extra $X a year to provide [SERVICE] for other people?"
Me: "Because the data shows that this will lead to better outcomes overall, which in turn leads to fewer people on public assistance, saving you far more than $X a year, resulting in a net gain on your part. Here's the data, look for yourself."
Them: "Fuck that. I don't want poor people getting free shit!"

As long as half of the working class has billionaire Stockholm syndrome, this will not change.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

I always try to remind people of that fact of life

Whenever you see people in need in society .... everyone pays for their misfortune no matter what you do or what you believe

You can be a cold hearted conservative and you'll pay for what happens to these people in the form of higher taxes that go on to pay for increased policing, emergency medical, judiciary, general lawlessness and devaluing of your community as crime increases

You could be a liberal or socially minded and you'll pay for taxes that go on to help these unfortunate people in the form of social programs to try to help or mitigate their lives

However, the long term results of both these mentalities are what make the difference

Cold hearted conservatism to poverty only makes poverty much much worse and eventually leads to a break down of society as people's lives becomes worse and worse and civilization just becomes an expensive police state governed by violence

Socially minded supports foster young people and give them a chance to make a better future for themselves and go on to build a better society. Once you do that for a few generations, the benefits only increase with time not just for the individual but everyone in general.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's cause she doesn't have the slightest notion of what it's actually like being poor.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That is the strange part .... she grew up in the 50/60s in northern Ontario from an immigrant Italian family. They had enough to get by in their childhood but they were on edge of being poor ... like everyone else in northern mining/forestry towns back then.

They were part of the post war boom years where everyone had a chance and the rich were held down with enough taxes to fund everything the government did to build a more equitable country.

They got theirs because they thought that it was all done just through their effort and goodness alone and never acknowledging that it was more social government that made it all possible. Now that all those government supports and checks and balances on the rich are removed, no one has a chance and these old boomers still believe that it's all up to individual effort to get by in life.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago

They had enough to get by in their childhood but they were on edge of being poor

Honestly, sometimes people in that situation can come out of it with the most infuriating "well, we made it, other people must just be lazy" understanding.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

They’re required by law to be there ~~8+~~ 6+ hours. Fucking feed them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

You can do better: you could build trains or a power grid.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 77 points 2 days ago (2 children)

*But feeding them doesn't benefit me.

*every republicunt ever.

[–] death@infosec.pub 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Fuck you, I've got mine" seems to be the mantra of a shockingly large number of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 39 points 2 days ago

But have you considered that if the kids aren't starving, they might not yearn for the mines?

[–] arin@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Why do animals feed their young? Why should we not feed our children as civilized humans?

[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Animals are socialist and communist. I am capitalist. Capital rulezzzz!!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Taxes pay for the building, the heating, the electricity, the teacher salaries, the lunch tables, the trays, the cafeteria staff salaries...but also paying for the food so that all that other expense isn't wasted because the kids aren't paying attention is apparently too far

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And that’s what gets me. Taxes pay for so much of that, and adding school lunch is a much smaller investment toward getting successful use out of those expensive resources. Even in utilitarian terms, free school lunch has a high return on investment.

And forget means testing: have you seen how cheap school lunches are per kid? How can you justify means testing and enforcement that will cost much more than just equal treatment no matter each kids financial circumstances

[–] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is the problem with everything in the US. We don't settle on anything or finish the argument. We're just stuck in an endless cycle of debate and argument rather than using knowledge and understanding to just answer the fucking question. Like trans rights and abortion is simply about body autonomy, or health insurance and wages is about ensuring a better more stable economy and healthier population. Instead we endlessly argue culture, religion, and price rather than progress and dividends through our actions. It's infuriating but how do we change it?

[–] karashta@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Eat the rich.

Many of the cyclical culture war issues are largely manufactured by those in power to divide us.

Remove those in power.

Educate people away from hyper individualism.

As for specifics, I'm not totally sure, but this seems a general good place to start.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"But if we fund children how are we supposed to fund genocide and the capitalists"

  • Trump and the entire Republican party
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Conservatives are under the influence of demons. If you are religious, then this statement is what it is. 1 Timothy 4:1, which states, "Now the Spirit clearly tells us that in the last times, some will depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons." If you are not religious, then take this as a statement of them having "personal demons" or mentally illnesses that make them greedy and make them worship those that are greedy with cult-like devotion.

Most modern conservatives are incurably insane. The purest evil fools others into thinking it is a force of good, it fools others into thinking it is stupid when it is calculating and exact. Conservatives are pure evil, they give nothing but hatred and suffering to others and the world would be a much better place without them in it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›