this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
834 points (97.7% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

583 readers
487 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't he democratically elected winning both the electoral college and the popular vote? Democracy is not a guarantee that you will get the best or most qualified leader, just the most popular.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They have to uphold the constitution and the rule of law!

Do you think they just get elected and then do whatever they want? That's not the US, not until this idiocy.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 minutes ago

That’s not the US,

That is exactly what US is. They even told you before the election that this is what will be happening if diaper donny gets elected.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

It's even worse when they downplay it and act like nothing's wrong.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)
[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 minute ago

America: "The government is constantly ignoring the constitution!!!" Also america: ignores the 2nd amendment of the constitution which gives very clear directives on how to deal with the government that igores the constitution.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Cheering on the ever encroaching fascism as it happens in real time.

[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

a lot of people myself believe that democrats at this point are as much part of the problem, they do what the lobbyist and ultrarich want and totally ignore the voters.

so why fight half the country to only replace trump with a scum like schumer ?

if dnc was worth voting for then trump would never got elected. instead we have gotten lesser evil junk from them for 3 election in a row, the lesser evil that shamelessly funded a genocide when people have been struggling to buy groceries.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago

Even if we accept that voting third party is futile we then need to accept that the democratic party leadership needs to be completely purged. But any criticism of the leadership then gets met with "why do you support Trump?".

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

From over 100 years ago. Humans never really seem to change all that much.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

There are lots of threads that make up this tapestry of shit.

  • Aipac
  • Citizens United v. FEC
  • Corporatism
  • Regulatory Capture
  • High campaign cost
  • 2 party system
  • Military Industrial Complex

But it seems we could cut (or at least weaken) them all at once by banning lobbying.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Put your money where your mouth is, Letterman. You’re worth almost a half billion, so what are you risking other that being just another rich guy telling others to do the heavy lifting while you stay nice and safe?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Sad to say that in a fascist regime, even speaking up like this puts a target on Letterman's back. Trump is thin-skinned and petty.

Moving the average at "something is wrong" towards "let's do something about it" is a step in the right direction.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Unfortunately it will take popular people being targeted with severe injustice to raise the ire of the public at large. If high profile wealth wants to play it safe the masses will suffer much greater losses before change can be effected.

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

And just what is it exactly that you are risking here just calling it down online on a forum?

What is it you hope to achieve here in a world of updoots voters and influencers?

You’re playing the exact same game.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You don’t know what we’ve done. I can’t doxx myself to tell you what my family will likely be dealing with thanks to political action. Suffice to say we’ll probably be single income in short order, at least for a while, thanks to actual risk taken.

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

Nope. That is some bullshit. I smell a bot. I don’t believe you. Another story you can easily make up online. So again, you’re doing nothing different in the mode of delivering a message online for a reaction.

And you refused to Answer my question: what was it you’re hoping to achieve by talking down positive speeches here?

Making people feel like shit. Discourage. Minimize. That is what you’re doing here.

I have zero tolerance for this infighting bullshit you’re trying to shit stir here. pretending to be a dem attacking other dems is only the exact type of shit that a Russian bot does. They lie a lot online to manipulate people.

Not on my watch.

Go huff your farts Russian bot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The Republican Party dies as soon as that happens. Every Republican knows it. That's why they will fight to keep it from happening and grift the situation as long as they can.

Fascism does not outlive the guy at its center. It can't. Anybody who could step up to take control would have been a threat to the old leader's position. The leader, therefore, has to make sure his people are loyal to him personally, and that tends to select for people who aren't very competent and are incapable of fermenting the same sort of faux populist up swell.

[–] Sillyglow@lemmy.ca 8 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

The republicans realized it yesterday when he took the plane. That was the nail in the coffin of their party.

That moment when even they admit if the dems did this; reps would go wild.

Presidency isn’t a business that closes once the term is up. It’s a turn in the game. They kept forgetting that until the plane happened.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago

The republicans realized it yesterday when he took the plane. That was the nail in the coffin of their party.

Keep dreaming.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 10 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

That was the nail in the coffin of their party.

Thing is, I heard that multiple times during his first term.

I'm not saying you are wrong, maybe you are right. But I'm not so easily convinced after all the shit he consistently gets away with. There were people on their covid death beds who were still anti-mask/vax and pro-Trump.

If people are still stubbornly holding onto their beliefs as they directly face their own mortality more or less because of them, its hard to imagine a bribe being the red line.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 15 hours ago

The republicans realized it yesterday when he took the plane. That was the nail in the coffin of their party.

I'll believe that when they do something about him

[–] Tracaine@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

"...think of the solution, not the problem. If your mind was filled only with thoughts of why you were going to lose, then you couldn't think of how to win." - Richard Rahl

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

A lot of very smart people want to get rid of Trump. The main problem is the hundreds of opportunists riding on his coattails, who are currently in charge of Congress and won't let anything happen to him because it will affect their own fortunes. Hell, some of them are just sitting silently in committee meetings because they can't speak in Trump's favor without committing perjury, so they refuse to respond to questions (even though that's their job). Unless Bonespurs has his final Big Mac Attack while in office, I think we're stuck with him until 2026, when some of his Congressional minions might lose their seats and his lock on the US government will loosen a little.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 96 points 1 day ago (16 children)

The problem I have with this thinking is that people think Trump caused this and that the fascist problem will go away if he does.

He is a symptom. We need to fix the cause. I'm not saying I have all the answers, but going back to 'the old way of solving problems' and not changing anything will just lead to more fascists.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›