61
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Followupquestion@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I think it’s a multifaceted problem. Police data is being scrutinized more heavily, arrests and forced confessions are being broadcasted widely, more and more people have wised up to the golden rule of don’t talk to cops, and police are tasked with so many stupid/useless things like the drug war, stopping abortions, arresting kids in schools whose parent just died of cancer, that they don’t devote enough resources to actual crimes like murders. Plus, you know, people are lazy in general and cop unions are the best at protecting their members.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Police have spent decades destroying any trust in their institution and they're learning the hard way that they literally can't do their job when everybody hates their guts. Sure their unions can keep them out of jail, but it's not going to do anything to make the average citizen be willing to talk to them.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

But we have so many Podcasters and suburban moms on the case!

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Tonight on Only Murders in the US...

[-] bunkyprewster@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

Cops are on strike. If their racism is going to be questioned, they don't want to do their job.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

They'll gladly keep absorbing all those tax dollars though, and you better give them a COL increase in next year's budget or else fire and brimstone will rain down from the sky.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Interesting. The murder rate has gone down over the last three decades and the clearance rate went down with it. You would think police could focus more time on solving the fewer number of murders. Or maybe they are just unable to force confessions these days.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's showing that it was never a problem of not enough time to devote to any particular murder, but a lack of evidence due to the competence of the murderer. Essentially the murderers were more competent than the police for a certain subset of murderers, so even though there are fewer total murders happening the percentage of them being carried out competently remains the same.

Police in general are actually alarmingly bad at solving crimes. The ones they do solve tend to be cases where they either get incredibly lucky, the criminal is incredibly stupid, or both. Most cases are solved because the criminal was caught in the act, caught on camera, or told someone else about their crime and that person turned them in. Winning the case against them might come down to the evidence collected, but that initial arrest usually isn't because of evidence left at the scene.

[-] notyourusername@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Give tickets to car owners instead of drivers, enforce traffic laws with cameras like the rest of the developed world, and move the 80% of cops currently on traffic to working real crimes (with a bit more training, less in the warrior mentality, too.)

Americans are so corrupted by profit mechanisms and resistant to effective change.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Graph label is cut off but it goes from 1960 to 2020. Was the clearance rate in 1960 really above 90%? I'm surprised.

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think it’s all the forensic crime TV shows. The layperson now has a pretty clear understanding of how to not get caught.

this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
61 points (95.5% liked)

News

23311 readers
3626 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS