723
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The candidate who delivered Trump his first term, still doubling down on her "deplorables" strategy 7 years later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

For the love of all that is, that has been, and that will be, get out and vote. Hillary opened her fucking mouth and the last time she did this shit Trump won. Every Democrat should now be rushing to the polls. The cycle is trying to repeat.

[-] ensignrick@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

She was the candidate with so little enthusiasm of the voters. That still lost to drumpf with almost 3 million more votes...

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And with raiding the coffers of down ballot races by misrepresenting a "donation sharing scheme".

People were giving donations to state parties, who gave the vast majority to Hillary.

It didn't just hurt their races, it burnt bridges with lots of people who routinely donated to states and who knows when they'll start again.

She was willing to burn it out down to win because she knew it really was her last chance to be president.

Hell, she's the main reason Trump made it to the general because she was the only one she had a chance at beating.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think Godwin's Law now dictates that she has already lost the 2024 Presidential Election.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

BACK TO THE FORESTS WITH YOU YOU FUCKING GHOUL

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MuuuaadDib@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Considering her accuracy with him, this should make everyone who cares about the nation worried.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Was she accurate when she instructed Dem media partners to elevate Trump by name with the strategy being that he'd be too extreme for the general election?

Was she accurate when she was taking a preemptive victory lap in Texas on election night 2016?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are people seriously voting for trump? There is no reason other than authoritarianism. It's kinda disturbing.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I hate that there are so many Trump supporters on Lemmy.

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Are there though? I haven't seen any so far, but they are a scourge ultimately.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

As she defends neo-librealist neo-facism at home and neo-facists in Israel...

[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

She totally doesn't look like a Disney villain in this picture /s

load more comments (2 replies)

Ah yes the rampant sexism of American politics is on full display

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
723 points (90.2% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2201 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS