this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
507 points (98.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

11664 readers
842 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Capitalists don't innovate. They gut public services and then claim they invented the idea...

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

if I had a nickle every time a techbro invented a bus or a train, I'd probably be able to afford a fucking bigmac

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

And they 'invent' it in a way that would make a 19th century engineer want to bust their heads against a wall. Because their train replacements are ironically less efficient than a late 19th century railway locomotive.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And then when people complain because its an inherently worse service, they resort to "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" and "just start your own company even though you have no capital" type bullshit.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago
[–] andybytes@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

WOAH! This is an AMAZING idea! WHY hasn't Anyone THOUGHT of this Before? It's INCREDIBLE!

-People who Vote AGAINST Public Transportation and will COMPLAIN about how Expensive this is!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No it's privatized, so somebody at the top is getting rich. See that's the important part for these assholes. They just don't want the government spending that money when they could be spending it on more airplanes to drop into the fucking ocean.

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

I like the spice...cheff kiss

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Public transit can be privatized and run for profits. Good example is Japan metro and train networks. Bad ones are bus routes in latinamerica.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Germany's partial privatization of public transit, led to major issues like underinvestment, frequent delays, and high costs for passengers, underfunding, and profit-driven management.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

profit-driven management.

This alone explains pretty much every other problem

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The trolley system in early 20th century US cities died due to issues related to privatization. It's been done; doesn't work.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well, it's more like the model was unsustainable. The trolley system was originally built by neighborhood builders as a neighborhood amenity to attract buyers. When the neighborhood was all sold up, the builder would hand the system over to the city, who would then fund the maintenance of the system via ? which was fine and dandy for a while because rail infra doesn't need half the maintenance asphalt does, but once you had enough of these lines aging out and piling up maintenance issues all at once and the city having done almost no planning to fund said maintenance, the cities would reliably just say "fuck it, let people drive" rather than try pulling teeth via passing a tax or something. From here in 2025, I'm ready to send a terminator back in time at them over it, but I can see how they arrived there in the context of their time.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

who would then fund the maintenance of the system via ?

Via property tax. The same way local roads are maintained

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Right. Well, IIRC property tax is collected by the county and then sliced up and divvied out to different municipalities, which, also IIRC, then goes into the municipal general fund. If the city is stupid and doesn't plan maintenance, and instead treats the rail as a free good, then when it comes time to keep up on it, it's easier to just shrug and replace it with a business service.

What's more is that you also had GM going around and basically taking the EEE approach to municipal transit by offering ridiculously cheap bus services to replace trams, only to end them a short while later. So, it's not all on the cities, though one wishes they'd had the foresight to understand that private companies never do stuff out of the goodness of their hearts.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is that if the profitable routes are private, who will run the unprofitable ones? This is effectively siphoning money away from the profitable public transit routes placing more of a burden on transit agencies.

That being said, even if it's 50% cheaper than a normal uber I doubt anyone will use it.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

If there's already public transport on the route, why would anyone chose a presumably more expensive Uber-bus?

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The fragmentation of railway companies is horrible to deal with. Tokyo is a mix between JR and Keisei and you need to buy a separate ticket for each.

At least they run really well.

[–] weirdboy@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

There are actually more operators than just JR and Keisei, but transferring between any of them is usually very quick and painless if you have any of the major transportation network cards in Japan, or associated NFC app. Only tourists actually buy tickets at the machines.

However, it does tend to cost more than sticking to one operator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 113 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Is this not just a bus but worse?

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 80 points 2 days ago

Well you don't have to ride with the poors and you pay direct instead of taxes for maximum inefficiency of money for value.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 58 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's a shared taxi/marshrutka/dollar van/jitney ... Too many names but common across the world especially where the government is incapable of organizing proper public transport.

Just repackaged for techbros.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

especially where the government is incapable of organizing proper public transport

So, perfect for the USA then?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Exactly this. Interestingly, while in "those" places the government is incapable of organizing public transit, in US, the government chooses not to. It's like learned helplessness at the society level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Busses are going to get privatized....that's this administrations goal, privatize everything.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Here's one more for "trains is to transportation what crabs are to evolution '

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You guys don't get it. It is like public transportation but with the following "features":

  1. No poors.
  2. Owner can exclude anyone they don't like
  3. No job security/unionization for the staff
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wait wait wait hear me out, what if we had something bigger than a car and it still had a single driver but multiple passengers???

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Like a library but for travelling?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

public library transport! we might be onto sth here

[–] lgsp@feddit.it 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And more expensive too!

Next step: reinvent the train, but call it uber on steel or uber on rails

[–] f314@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (5 children)

You just know it’s going to be individual rail cars so we can have traffic jams on rails!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, private sector innovation

[–] OBXDadLife@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

In reality, it is first mile and last mile.

If you're in a wheelchair or you oare therwise are ADA eligible, they will give you a ride to/from a public transit stop.

The onus is on the transportation system to be ADA accessible beyond the dropoff.

There are also employment partners who will pay for this leg.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We are 10 years from UberRail

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the UK uber started advertising that you can buy your train tickets via the uber app. Like WTF, no thanks I’ll just use Train Line.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How much of a cut do they take?

Train Line or Uber?

Either way I’m not sure to be honest.

[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Adam Something has a done a whole bunch of videos ridiculing tech bro reinventions of bus and train, great stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 17 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Lemme guess, next they'll try connecting multiple carriages to carry more people per vehicle then work with local governments to build dedicated right of way...etc etc...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] applemao@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If there is something anyone under 30 should have learned in today's world, is that capitalism will ALWAYS enshittify even the best idea. Always.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

And anyone over 30 should have learned it before they were 30.

load more comments
view more: next ›