A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
175 billion dollars to build a thing in just a few years that's meant to protect America from attacks...
What attacks? Terrorists hijacking planes? Russians capturing the presidency? Right wing extremism? School shootings?
There's nothing immediate. And some trumpy dome doesn't sound like we're future proofing anything but Lockheed Martin's bank accounts.
Let's be honest, what dome? They couldn't even build a wall against the Mexicans, and now a dome. What's the point? LMAO
Trump announced his plans the previous day to develop the multilayered, $175 billion (€155 billion) system with ground- and space-based capabilities that can defend against a wide range of enemy weapons
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_development
the program was expected over its lifetime (until 2070) to cost $406.5 billion for acquisition of the jets and $1.1 trillion for operations and maintenance.
blud thinks he's on the team 💀
US is probably trying to get some of the benefits that new Over-The-Horizon Radar that Canada just bought from Australia. Just remember, Canada needs the Dome less than US since US is more aggressive abroad. So don't get trampled in the negotiations. plus, it probably wouldn't protect Canada if the missile comes from inside the dome.
This would be such a dumb decision. Does anyone remember Star Wars? Not the movie, the defense system Regan started? Isn’t this the same thing? It will never come to fruition, billions of dollars will disappear into private company’s pockets.
billions of dollars will disappear into private company’s pockets.
That’s probably the whole purpose of it.
Advancements in technology since Reagan’s attempt makes this more feasible today. While it is more technically feasible it is just as stupid now as it was then.
How? Hypersonic missiles should make it more difficult.
Add automation for cheap production costs and any defence system can be overwhelmed.
"Let's spend a tonne of money to try to break mutually-assured destruction so we can have a whole new nuclear arms race"
Spot on.
Do it, Canada, then stall and stall and stall on your end. Put the Canadian Golden Dome HQ in Quebec and send all communication in French. Also, use the metric system. They’ll never know what hit them. C’est magnifique
I can't wait for the US to shoot a missile into their own land because they don't know the difference between kilos and miles
If I recall correctly, that’s already happened with a space mission (I think it was a Mars satellite). The EU used kilometers, which is the scientific norm anyway, and for some reason, the US used miles. The trajectory was WAY off.
The only enemy Canada currently needs protection from is the U.S. This "golden dome" isn't to protect Canada but to keep outside support out when the U.S. finally invades. As general Ackbar said "it's a trap".
Come on Canada, don't fall for any Trump bullshit. It has a flashy name but will be full of grift and empty promises.
Oh totally - remember space force from the last Trump administration ?
I can’t emphasize this enough: DO NOT PAY FOR ANYTHING UPFRONT
Yeah how is this not bending the knee and becoming the 51 state?
Diplomacy often means appearing to do one thing while actually doing another.
They smile and nod, get tariffs exemptions, then somehow never actually involve themselves in this shambles.
If you think really hard, you may find a difference between Starwars As a Service and gargling Trump's tiny boner. It's a subtle thing but it's there if you look. It's like how when you get milk from the bodega you don't also give the clerk a handjob. Nuance.
Sure buddy enjoy that trump boner. And Bodega leche with hands 😂😂😂
This will shackle us to the bloated corpse of the US.
Agree. However, stalling works. Canada is great at that.
Shhh, don't give away our secrets
As long as it doesn't become this era's Avro Arrow.
We should be buying European missle defense while developing our own.
Not great to see from Canada.
To be fair, not great to see from anywhere.
I don't trust Trump to execute it properly, tbh.
Honestly though, anti-missile shields are something we (humanity) needs. Any moron these days can throw it all away in a suicidal instant, now that Putin started a new war and now we have a bunch of smaller wars all over.
But DART showed the promise of orbital defenses, and I'd rather we have some semblance of countermeasures against large meteors, which this is a step towards doing. (Still, climate change is the existential threat that the entire world should be focusing on)
I really hope they realize this is nothing more than a means of shoveling massive sums of money to the MIC with little to nothing to show for it other than a “strong economy.”
It's a trap!
Feel sorry for our northern neighbors in all this. Whatever the hell Trump is planning that would require the golden dome defense system, Canada doesn’t want to be catching strays from the conflict. But damn, what a terrible waste of resources.
Build dat wall I guess. Idiots.
Named after Trump's wig?
No thanks
Carney just won for his anti-Trump stance. And now dude's making deals with him just a couple weeks later.
Canadians, are you pissed off?
We didn't vote for Carney for his hatred of Trump. If we voted for Carney's party, it was because the alternative would have already sold us out completely.
...Like, in a heartbeat. We'd already be rounding up the inuit and sending them to Trinidad or something equally as wrong. I'd be saving my money for my routine MRI coming up. We'd be dismantling the train system to make some offensive statue of Milhouse the Squatter.
Are you suggesting we'd think Carney's perfect and not merely the better of two imperfect choices? Do you know how politics works?
I'm going off headlines. So maybe the reality has been distorted. But as a non-Canadian looking in this is how it's been presented to us
People like OP are either malicious or stupid. Or bots. Rather than try to make their guy look good, they try to make everyone else look bad.
I'm definitely annoyed at the optics of it if nothing else, but for now I am cautiously optimistic that they know what they are doing and that this is a carefully calculated discussion.