795
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Pope Francis on Saturday forcibly removed the bishop of Tyler, Texas, a firebrand conservative prelate active on social media who has been a fierce critic of the pontiff and has come to symbolize the polarization within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy.

A one-line statement from the Vatican said Francis had “relieved” Bishop Joseph Strickland of the pastoral governance of Tyler and appointed the bishop of Austin as the temporary administrator.

Strickland, 65, has emerged as a leading critic of Francis, accusing him in a tweet earlier this year of “undermining the deposit of faith.” He has been particularly critical of Francis’ recent meeting on the future of the Catholic Church during which hot-button issues were discussed, including ways to better welcome LGBTQ+ Catholics.

Earlier this year, the Vatican sent in investigators to look into his governance of the diocese, amid reports that priests and laypeople in Tyler had complained and that he was making unorthodox claims.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 264 points 1 year ago

He's gonna go start his own church with blackjack and children.

[-] GeekFTW@kbin.social 99 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Under~~aged~~rated comment right there!

[-] rdrunner@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

He will 100% use this to start a new church to siphon funds from his snowflake congregation

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 23 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't doing that literally be considered heresy? That doesn't really mean much in the modern day I suppose, but if he actually believes all the Catholic stuff (which I imagine he might, to have gotten that high a rank in it in the first place?), then potentially getting excommunicated is probably not something he would want.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago

Good. More of this. Fuck these conservatives wolves in bishops clothing.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

Next let's expell all the diddlers... you can't tell me they aren't still around...

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Tin foil hat

I read some Italian news story on how basically all the bishops at the vatican are playing politics and slow rolling any real progress on kicking out the diddlers. Probably trying to save the sanctity of the church, but mostly billions in damages paid out to victims.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 94 points 1 year ago

Wait but wasn't a dogma that the word of the Pope IS the word of God? So that guy is an heretic and should be burnt at the stake

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Only when the pope chooses to speak as god, forget the fancy term.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

The Catholic doctrine of papal infallibility means that the pope has the power as head of the Church to declare something an unquestionable part of Church doctrine. This was last used to declare "the Virgin Mary went to heaven" as part of the Catholic doctrine. The "infallible" part of "papal infallibility" means that the pope's decision on the matter is final and that is the end of the discussion.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Not sure where Catholics got that. The Bible pretty clearly says Mary is burning eternally in hell for having premarital sex with the Holy Spirit.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Was it pre-marital or extra-marital?

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

Guess it’s both, isn’t it?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes. When he’s speaking formally.

When he calls the nurse wiping his decrepit ass “a hot piece of tail”… that’s not formal doctrine. That’s just his mortal opinion. I believe the official term is when he’s speaking “ex cathedral”. There may be times broader than that, that count, but it’s a pretty obvious thing when he is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

That’s it, thank you. It’s…. Been a while.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GeekFTW@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Ex cathedra, iirc (or something similar).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a heresy called sedevacantism that basically believes the last few Popes don't count because they've taken positions that the real Pope would never take.

They don't do the burning at the stake bit anymore though.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 15 points 1 year ago

Some people are lucky that today's popes don't act like the popes of the olden days.

BTW, which one was the last true Pope in theory eyes? I bet it's the fascist one

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

I think most of them think the last real pope was Pius XII, and yeah he was the guy who signed the Reichskonkordat with the Nazis, which required priests in Germany to take an oath of loyalty to the German Reich.

He actually did that as Secretary of State before he became pope, on behalf of the previous pope, so they were both fash.

The reason sedevacantists dislike his successor, John XXIII, is that they are really upset about the Second Vatican Council introducing ideas like "the beneficial nature of diversity" and "concern for secular human values." That's the moment when they think the church went off the rails.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Skates@feddit.nl 83 points 1 year ago

I don't get how you can be 'too progressive'. Surely progress is a good thing, no? If you're against progress, you're in favor of things remaining as they are or getting worse. To me, that's just being a cunt.

I guess what I'm saying is, "Pope removes bishop for being too much of a cunt" would've been a good headline also.

[-] modeler@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Many people worked hard within the current hierarchy or system to attain power. They essentially invested their time, resource or energy for this gain over a lifetime. Progressives want change to the existing power heirarchies and systems. That change nullifies the lifetime investment. That's why there is such institutional resistance to progressives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spendrill@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

To me, that’s just being a cunt.

Welcome to religious conservatism.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Progress for one man can be regression for other.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Not for religion, it is about power and control.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Progress in general is just a term. What people consider to be "progressive" can change from person to person. There's also the obvious risk of progressing too quickly before things can stabilize, you could progress a third world country far quicker than their people/culture would be able to keep up, for example.

While I understand and agree with your general sentiment, but the idea that progress is actually progress just because it carries the term is a fallacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago

We have an expression in Québec for people who either:

1- Defend someone else's interests with more fervor than the other person themselves.

2- To have extremist values, thoughts or actions.

The expression is "Être plus catholique que le pape." Or to be more Catholic than the pope himself.

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Oh this guy definitely thinks himself the most holy Catholic person to ever live. He is light years away from the papacy in terms of ever being Pope, but definitely casually suggests to his followers that HE some random fuck in Texas would be a better Pope than the actual Pope

[-] DieguiTux8623@feddit.it 17 points 1 year ago

In Italian we say "more royalist than the king". Btw, the Pope was criticized even by Italian politicians because "they know better" what the Catholic faith should be like. And I'm not referring to some minor party, but to the very backbone of the current government. It seems like the Pope is intentionally trying to mess up their whole electoral campaign based on tradicional family and morality.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Not very surprising considering the current government is far right and they always believe they know better than anyone else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

We have pretty much the same expression in English!

[-] grue@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Despite the evilness of the Catholic church as a whole, I've got to say I kinda like Pope Francis. Too bad the majority of religious leaders aren't more like him.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

He still protected sexual abusers like Cardinal McCarrick. He's handled the PR of sexual abuse than his predecessors, but he hasn't excommunicated a single abuser or enabler. He hasn't turned any records over to law enforcement.

Religious leaders need better role models than the pope.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Don’t forget he basically said Charlie Hebdo had it coming.

Dude’s still an ass, he’s just a comparatively smaller ass than his predecessors.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He's no saint, though.

What you're mentioning is the equivalent of "huh, this pope gives us 10 fewer kicks in the nuts per day than the previous popes. I kinda like him!"

He wants to welcome lgbt people in the church? The reaction shouldn't be "oh he's so good!" It should be "about damn time, fuckers!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 52 points 1 year ago

The modern church is the shell of the institution it once was. Which is a good thing. Let's make it even less relevant than it already is.

[-] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

The goal isn't to make it hollow, the goal is to shrink the size proportional to honest participation, so that it doesn't have an outsized influence on the general population.

[-] MycoBro@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If it was the whole turtle they would have burned the pedo-, excuse me, pries-cough cough child fucker at the stake for blasphemy.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 39 points 1 year ago

Churches of all kinds are destroying themselves with politics.

[-] spicysoup@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago

From the article:

“This is total war,” Matt wrote on X, formerly Twitter. “Francis is a clear and present danger not only to Catholics the world over but also to the whole world itself.”

Matt is the editor of a traditionalist newspaper. That guy needs to touch grass. How stupid can a person be?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pubertthefat@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Tyler TX is also home to Idiot Child Louie Gohmert. There are churches and banks on every corner, and every time there's new construction there's a 50% chance it's either a church or a bank.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

laypeople in Tyler had complained and that he was making unorthodox claims.

Oh you.

[-] Kleinbonum@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago

Honestly, though: good for those Catholic laypeople in Texas to complain to the friggin' Vatican that this guy is a compete nut job!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Fun fact about Tyler, TX...

Ok I'm at a loss.

[-] zepheriths@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If I remember right. A friend said that Tyler Texas is also where a bad racist act happened.

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

True for any Insert Texas name here

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] autotldr 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


ROME (AP) — Pope Francis on Saturday forcibly removed the bishop of Tyler, Texas, a firebrand conservative prelate active on social media who has been a fierce critic of the pontiff and has come to symbolize the polarization within the U.S. Catholic hierarchy.

The Vatican never released the findings and Strickland had insisted he wouldn’t resign voluntarily, saying in media interviews that he was given a mandate to serve as bishop in 2012 by the late Pope Benedict XVI and couldn’t abdicate that responsibility.

Francis has not been shy about his concerns about the right wing in the U.S. Catholic hierarchy, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St. John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

In comments to Portuguese Jesuits in August, Francis blasted the “backwardness” of these conservative bishops, saying they had replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

The meeting debated a host of previously taboo issues, including women in governance roles and welcoming LGBTQ+ Catholics, but in the end, its final document didn’t veer from established doctrine.

In a social media post sent a few hours before the Vatican’s noon announcement, Strickland wrote a prayer about Christ being the “way, the truth and the life, yesterday, today and forever.” He had changed the handle from his previous @bishopoftyler to @BishStrickland.


The original article contains 1,068 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Good, can we suggest others to remove?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
795 points (98.1% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2581 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS