It is a nice p2p, e2ee messaging app/service that doesn't use phone numbers, e-mail or other domain addresses as an identifier. I think it used to be GNU Ring, and can be used as a SIP client.
The SIP part looks nice, I hadn't checked it out yet. Thanks!
One other thing I forgot to mention - transparency of the lead developer and service provider is overlooked, imo, as a criteria for picking a secure messaging client. That background information on jami wasn't terribly clear to me when I looked a couple of years ago; it does seem better now.
You could call it p2p since there is no Jami servers. Yes it does messaging and video conferencing. I see no point to Jami due to having to me installed compared to Jitsi would does group video cinferencing without installing it, and anybody can run their own Jitsi server to host conferences to keep them even more private away from the broader internet. The email service I use also has a Jitsi service available that I have used for video conferencing.
I am strongly supportive of what Jami does, I don't see it ever replacing a similar service like Jitsi or Sgnal.
That was my main intent for Jami as well; I like the idea and want to support it, but it will serve no purpose for me (at least currebtly). Never heard of Jitsi before, so thanks for that too :)
I was enthusiastic for Jami around 7 years ago, but now it is wholly irrelevent or meaningless. It also hurts the fact that absolutely nodo is using it.
Now with having Jitsi to use, which is a service and not a program so it doesn't matter if nobody is on there, plus SimpleX and Signal, as good as Jami legitmately is, it truly means absolutely nothing.
I am already of the opinion that there too many messenging apps and not enough people using open source encrypted apps of any kind to move the market away for corporate proprietary messengers. I'm always working on getting people off of Whatsapp on to Signal/Molly. Maybe Jami team should quit and jump to developing SimpleX.
I gave Jami a very extensive go with family, and sadly it didn't deliver a usable experience if your device is a mobile one or the network is not a fixed, high-speed connection.
Oh dang it. Hopefully they'll improve the performance in poor connectivity, since it's basically unusable for me without it :/
Honestly don't know.
For WhatsApp alternative we have Matrix and XMPP, for Discord alternative Matrix would be better, for Zoom alternative Jitsi is better, for off-road protest messaging Briar is better.
Courious what it is used for. I see they have Android TV app, maybe for P2P conferencing?
I tried using jami with family, but it was not accesible because of issues with making the text and the ui bigger.
If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.