this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
1085 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
3233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The author probably forgot who runs the nation of usa.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Congress has always had this power. I'm personally for nationalizing telecomm companies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We no longer live in a world where our biggest fear would be the government controlling high level corporations and their operators.

We now live in a world controlled by Sociopathic Oligarchs who can afford to create government level technology. Right now it's mostly tourism rockets and satellites, but now we see Skum weaponizing that technology, and/or using it as a bargaining chip. He has cut off Starlink in a war zone to benefit the county who defers to him, but is openly hostile to the US, and now he's threatening to cut off our access to the space station. He is using tech that WE PAY FOR with government contracts and grants, to pursue his own diplomacy, for his own benefit, and against our interests.

Eventually, someone will start building and stockpiling actual weapons, perhaps even atomics. Then we will be asking why someone didn't step in and stop them before they became a bonafide threat.

We paid for Skum's technology, and he gets to control it as a courtesy. Just the threat of using it against us should be enough reason to declare him a national security threat, confiscate his American-taxpayer financed businesses, and imprison him.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (14 children)

We should just fund NASA and let SpaceX and Starlink go bankrupt to competitors.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

See what we should do......is look to the french for inspiration on guillotine designs. Why would anyone not want to get rid of this asshole? Why would anyone like him?

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They think he's a tech god because he has money to burn, knows how to make himself look smart, knows how to slave drive, and knows how to cut corners without pissing off the wrong people.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

At least, there was a time when that appeared to be the case

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 50 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Lets reach a compromise. Impeach Trump (successfully) and then take away SpaceX from Elon. That way things would be fair.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Trump has been impeached successfully. Twice. What I assume you mean is that he hasn't been removed from office. That could be the consequence of an impeachment, but not necessarily.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nasa with less risk aversion. If a Nasa rocket blows up that's big news. If a Space X rocket blows up, that's a Tuesday.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Grizzlyboy@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I don’t think the majority of Americans understand what that means. They’ll just scream “commies!” And raise their maga flag.

But the idea of a starlink-like business owned by UN would be nice, and not an American corporation owned by a nepobaby Elmo.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In the USA space-x gets away with a lot. A few years ago they announced they were no longer going to bother with getting all the FAA approvals needed for their rockets because it took too long. Space-x still got government contracts.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

If your want proof that the wealthy live by a different set of laws, look no further than the time Elon Musk, ceo of SpaceX, went on a podcast and smoked weed.

SpaceX has DOD contracts for launches, and somehow him blatantly violating federal law had no impact on the contracts his company fulfilled for the government.

Do I think weed should be classified like it is? No.

Do I think that everyone should be held to the same standard? Yes. And if anyone else had been involved in government projects while going on podcasts and smoking weed, they’d at the very least be fired.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Has US nationalized anything this millenia? I really don't see that ever happening

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tax burdens for billionaires

Also losses. Gotta get that sweet, sweet too-big-to-fail bailout money.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Airport security was nationalized as the TSA. Aside from that no.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Arrest Musk on violation of controlled substances acts, file immigration violation charges, invalidate his ownership shares due to securities fraud, as he falsified education and naturalization forms.

Or just emminent domain the shit. The Law is just made up right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Giving companies to the state doesn't always work well. However giving companies to the workers does.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't give bail-outs to billionaires.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Oh my god, please. Just to see the temper tantrum from Musk.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If not Musk should be forced from his roles in these companies. You cannot be a defense contractor and do ketamine.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never gonna happen under republicans... or dems as they are sell outs too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I've been saying this for years. the footprint that spaceX represents in national launch authority is out of whack to say the least.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Starlink should not just be nationalized but internationalized.
It is internet for everyone on earth, not everyone in the USA.

Every larger nation deploying their own constellation would be a pointless waste of resources, and every smaller nation having to find reliable partner-nations to tap into for that internet access would inevitably lead to people ending up without access due to political games.

Low orbit satellite constellations are the perfect candidate for sharing, they would literally sit unused over most of their orbits otherwise.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just having such wealth and thus power in hands of singular humans is risk to all of humanity. With musk you are but big enough drug fueled temper tantrum away from pretty important infrastructure coming crashing down.

[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

seize it via eminent domain.

[–] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

We? No. USA can if it wants that shit.

[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (7 children)

American exceptionalism is so fucking annoying. Their country is failing to a point hopefully this first person shit rightfully corrects to third person.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›