this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
861 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23990 readers
4531 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ModestMeme@lemm.ee 150 points 1 day ago (31 children)

I just want to take a moment to say the “Biden was no better than Trump” crowd can go fuck themselves.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These things are always so annoying and uncritical. They are not wrong that the democrats are a conservative party, but that is still where the current progressive movement lives.

I think there is a bit of a trap in seeing the maga rise as a monolith, but I think there are two main wings. The evangelical side and the libertarian side. They might have some overlap, but their motivations and goals are still rather distinct. The important take away for this short essay of sorts is that they have agreed on enough points to move the overton window to get large parts of what they want. For the evangelicals it is abortion bans and ten commandments in schools. In the libertarian wing it is DOGE (inspired by the libertarian president in argentina)

Tankies and others who say “Biden was no better than Trump” are really messing up our ability to have a leftist/progressive party. In either growing it with-in the dems or starting from scratch. I want to understand what they are saying, but it is frustrating how unserious they are in actually achieving goals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago

No no, you see, voting for Biden would be voting for this too, somehow. Because they are part of the same system, or something? Both sides same and all that.

Honestly the mental gymnastics are too much for me to effectively work out into a distilled comment.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These people are protesting against extrajudicial deportation, deporting children, harassing legal immigrants, the Nazi government, etc.

It's not a fucking immigration protest. They didn't deploy the military for immigration protests. People spoke out against Nazis and the military was called in.

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago

Yeah, it’s no longer an “immigration protest”. It’s a NAZI protest.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 139 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Funny how he doesn't hesitate here, but when Congress was literally in danger of being fucking lynched on Jan 6, he didn't do shit.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

Only because Republicans despise California and Californians with all of their being.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] refract@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

If you don't own a gun, its time to get one, regardless of your stance on them. This is martial law without having to call it that.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/06/department-of-defense-security-for-the-protection-of-department-of-homeland-security-functions/

[–] pleasegoaway@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gavin Newson specifically said that he did not ask for or need the 2,000 troops and that sending to LA would only make things worse.

Sooo, there’s that.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Legally I believe the National Guard must be mobilized for a legal reason and until Trump has identified an actual cause, he cannot mobilize them himself. So Newson should just order them to stand down.

Newson hasn't done that though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

There is no challenging the military as the citizenry. This is terrible advice.

What we should be doing is encouraging insubordination by service members. Why the fuck would you agree to use military force against your fellow Americans, on American soil? Not only is that unconstitutional, it's simply not what you signed up for. Say no

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

Most states have a token State Guard that answers only to their governor, not the federal government. If Trump keeps this shit up, states are going to start disbanding their National Guard units, and shifting them into State control.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, and most of South America would disagree with you.

Anyway. GovCo can't win anyway. Not even in open hot war. They don't have the numbers.

Military and Natl Guard combined are less than 3,000,000 people. And that includes the logistics that makes it all work. They couldn't handle Afghanistan and its <50,000,000 people.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You overestimate how willing people are to throw their bodies at the problem. Things have to be so bad that they expect to die anyway. Otherwise, your militia sign-ups will be limited to only those most brave, ideological, or stupid.

You also underestimate how much more effective military training and ordinances are among the US military vs militias. If they really wanted to mow down civilians, it would be fish in a barrel, even if everyone in the militia is armed.

This is why the hope is that US service men are committed to the constitution and not to Drumpf's orders. It's a thin hope.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

They're committed to the paycheck. Don't be naive. Do you think American soldiers are uniquely unable to carry out atrocities? That sweet salty buttery baby jesus is gonna reach down, touch their hearts and make them defy orders? I'll refer you to uh, the last 25 years of action in the middle east.

This empire is dying live on TV. And all of them so far have ended bloody. We won't be the exception.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I did say it was a thin hope (well I said 'thing' but I've corrected it now).

But I think you give your service men too little credit. Even the police. How many fatalities or even serious injuries have actually occurred during protest activities? These a generally not people who want to kill anyone, particularly not their American brothers and sisters. But when one side dehumanizes the other, all bets are off. If things actually become life threatening, then everything changes. Kill or be killed.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I'm happy to be surprised. But I have set my expectations appropriately low.

I expect some inciting event over the summer. Someone gets killed by the feds and those protests really do turn into real riots. Then the clown prince will escalate. Open war by Christmas.

Like I said. I'm happy to be proven wrong. I would be delighted to be proven wrong. Maybe we'll luck out and he'll have a stroke mid ramble or maybe some general will shoot the bastard during his military parade. But I don't think we're that lucky.

Another possible is a general strike. That Union leader they black bagged earlier this week. He hasn't been released yet. If they try to deport him on some trumped up bullshit that's gonna have an apocalyptic backlash from basically every union except the police union.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 37 points 1 day ago

2000 Guardsmen. For a city of 3 million. And a governor who doesn't want them there. Sure. Good luck with that.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Shit MAGA creating their version of Tiananmen Square. I guarantee the fucking CCP and Russians are smiling.

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 286 points 1 day ago (11 children)

“The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior …”

Dude that’s your entire administration. Have some self-awareness, you orange, sagging, coffin dodging oxygen thief.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There is a good reason not to follow unconstitutional orders.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many fakes are in the crowd manipulating the situation for the oppositions political gain?

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup. And it's always these guy who are agitating for violence and "burning shiat down" and nobody can remember who this guy is or exactly when he joined the group.

They're called, "agents provocateurs" (google them. They're nothing new). They are government plants whose job is to start shit in peaceful protests to give the government an excuse to crack down violently.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They will provoke innocent people to become criminals. Remember their job is a business too. They play the game for money like gangsters.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] damdy@lemm.ee 60 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is actually insane. Bringing tanks to a knife fight... except it's not even a knife fight it's a thumb war. This is going to cause country wide rioting and Trump's only recourse will be to further up the anti. I feel worried for you guys.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 41 points 1 day ago (6 children)

This is all predictable. By next summer, besides more immigration crimes, we'll have food and product shortages, massive tariff-driven inflation, an economy roiling over his constant market manipulation, Luigi's trial, arrests of prominent politicians and resistors, etc. There will be protests against all of these issues and more, and he will use those protests to stir up trouble and create violence.

By next summer it will get really ugly, and he'll declare Martial Law, and suspend the Midterm election, so he can preserve his Congressional majorities.

Without Skum to rig the election, he will have no choice but to go with the Martial Law option.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Why wait until next summer - it’s happening now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›