[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Trump makes GW Bush look intelligent, aware of international issues and statesmanlike. I didn't used to think that that was possible

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Up till this comment I thought it was just another dumbass showing himself to be an idiot, but yes, now that you mention it, it very much sounds like children may have been abused by him when he was out there. Shit.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Nothing makes your crosser than people criticising trump, and nothing makes you happier than downplaying the criticism. You love to call people liars who disagree with you. I hope you'll give it a rest sometime soon when the polls have closed and you've run out of time to stand up for Trump, but I guess not because Trump isn't going to shut up any time soon and you'll not run out of things to defend him from.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Or, if you prefer,

No nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, nut, no nut, Nut, Nut, NUT.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

That's 16 nuts in a 30 day month. It's not no nut November and it's not non stop nut November, it's intermittent nut November.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

In the sense that a puddle and the sea are both wet, maybe.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

"Readers should be aware that while there is still a lot of relevant information to be found, not all fact briefs produced by Gigafact Foundry reflect Gigafact's current methods and standards for fact briefs."

I think that one comes under the category of superficially balanced by criticising both parties, and technically correct, but out of date in terms of remaining debt and wildly, grossly misleading in terms of the picture it paints.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

https://lemmy.world/u/damnedfurry

Read a few pages and you'll see the pattern. Nearly all of it supporting Trump or Republicans or picking holes in people who criticised them. You're not in the slightest bit objective, you're all for Trump. If you were actually objective, you would have more criticism for disgraced former president Trump and his five lies a minute deranged, deluded, reality denying self absorbed approach to everything.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I love this post. Thank you.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

It he could, he would. He thinks laws are for little people. Unimportant people. Not him.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 101 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't it be great if Trump had to follow the same laws as normal people. He's a complete traitor to the country.

81
192
Rules rule. (lemmy.world)

Remember, you are 10 times more awesome than you think you are, and 1000 times more awesome than some shitty hater made you feel.

Summary: You are awesome.

Reminder: Awesome.

43

It gets used online for things, and there are whole communities devoted to shitposting, but I can't find a clear set of rules for something to count as a shitpost. I remember querying whether a post on a shitposting community was witty enough to be a shitpost rather than just a shitty post, but of course not all the responses to that were terribly helpful!

13
I💦itrl (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago by davidagain@lemmy.world to c/i_itrl@feddit.org
194
view more: next ›

davidagain

joined 9 months ago