this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
19 points (91.3% liked)

Australia

4271 readers
336 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Aukus had a less than immaculate conception. It was conceived in secrecy and born in haste, a tribute to political opportunism and a travesty of disciplined planning. The enthusiasm of theatrical announcements notwithstanding, it was in trouble from the beginning. The US Navy had serious doubts about both the ability of US shipbuilders to deliver submarines in any workable timeframe and the ability of the Royal Australian Navy to integrate and operate them. That was not a question of trust but of capacity – on both sides.

And, of course, experienced and well-informed Australian defence planners rang the warning bells from the beginning.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

the biggest sticking point, apparently, was the american engineers' refusal to move the steering wheel to the starboard side of the boat.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Please Australia consider making deals with Europe, Canada, New Zealand, Taiwan, Japan and South Korea instead.

You can’t trust the fascist state who shot one of your reporters.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Isn't that the subs that France would have already delivered years ago for a fraction of the price, had Australia not cancelled the contract to order American subs that everyone told them would be late and over budget ?

[–] Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it's a real shame the French tried to fuck us over and change the original deal or else we'd still be doing business with them.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

All I can find is that the costs followed inflation as expected. And, yeah there were some delays but getting full sovereignty over the construction of your military submarines at the end of the contract is kind of a fucking amazing deal (because that was the end goal there, the transfer of technologies, including state of the art, silent non-nuclear propulsion and various other top secret shit, so Australia could ultimately build their own subs "with total sovereignty", according to the deal). I see zero mention of the terms of the contract changing after its signing apart from that.

And if you think that's bad I've got some news for you about the delays and costs of that AUKUS thing...

Edit : Also I doubt the next prime minister would have paid us $555 millions for breaking the contract if we were in the wrong here ?

Edit 2 : while researching the edit above, I found out that the AUKUS subs are nuclear powered ?? When a big part of the original deal was that Australia wanted non nuclear subs (All the ones we have in France are nuclear powered, so surely it would have been a lot easier to make one). Nah I'm sorry, you played yourselves and now you're mad at us somehow ?

Yep, those are the subs in question. A poor substitution at the time when it would have cost less just to swap to the French nuclear subs they initially offered

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Albo’s gonna have to go crawling back to the French

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, unless the Brits can pull a rabbit out of a hat.

At least he gets to blame Morrison, and Macron already called Scummo a liar to his face so there will be some sympathy (albeit along with a lot of schadenfreude)

The French have been getting a lot of "I told you so" in in the last 6 months, particularly the "have your own MIC don't rely on the yanks"

[–] kudra@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

To be fair, AUKUS wasn't his fault.

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All of this is just reinforcing that if you want something done right you have to do it yourself. Just build Collins 2.0 - no way it could be more expensive than what is already on the table.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

I think this was the original proposal in 2007 when Rudd was pm. We've been flip flopping on subs for almost 20 years

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is it just sunk cost fallacy at this point or do they know something we don't? There have been red flags for so long now that it will be a major embarrassment if AUKUS genuinely dies and we have no Plan B. "B-b-but the Coalition started it!!!!" won't cut it as an excuse for a second-term Labor government.

[–] Thecornershop@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I've often wondered if there is more to it that is classified or whatever. Albo was not a fan of it, then got a briefing and very quickly signed onto it without any public or even party debate. That stood out to me at the time, and has everytime it comes up since.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yup, the US was a much more reliable partner in the past but then usians supported/allowed the mango Mussolini win a second term.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

Even prior to that Pillar 1 seemed like a horrific deal for Australia. The serious question marks over whether the submarines would ever actually be delivered, let alone on time, existed all through the Biden administration too.