this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
607 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24209 readers
3121 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31570120

Four years after Gov. Greg Abbott announced Texas would be the first state to build its own border wall, lawmakers have quietly stopped funding the project, leaving only scattered segments covering a small fraction of the border.

That decision, made in the waning hours of this year’s legislative session, leaves the future of the state wall unclear. Just 8% of the 805 miles the state identified for construction is complete, which has cost taxpayers more than $3 billion to date. The Texas Tribune reported last year that the wall is full of gaps that migrants and smugglers can easily walk around and mostly concentrated on sprawling ranches in rural areas, where illegal border crossings are less likely to occur.

State leaders suggested the federal government could pick up the effort. However, during President Donald Trump’s first term, when wall building was his top priority, his administration completed just 21 miles in Texas — about a third of what the state was able to build over the past four years.

The Tribune reported last year that the state’s wall program would take around 30 years and more than $20 billion to complete.

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toga65@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unreal how gullible republican voters can be despite having information readily available

[–] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The quality of research done by people who advocate for “do your own research” is only as good as their education.

I have a friend who is my age, graduated college with me and likes to do his own research. I love the guy, but his ability to parse complex information is simply bad. He thinks that his own research on medical issues is superior to that of all doctors simply because he interprets what he reads in whatever way he wants it to mean. He never even tries to debunk anything.

I love the guy, and I’ve known him more than half my life now, but I have to simply humor him on medical advice.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Well a lot of their "ready" information is outright lies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It will always be a monument to the monumental failure of the Trump Admin.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

The Great Wall of Trump, just like him it cost too much, it's too short, and a failure.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Also Republicans as a whole since they were beating the drum for a border wall well before Trump ever joined their party.

Can't blame illegal aliens for everything if you actually keep them out.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Tribune reported last year that the state’s wall program would take around 30 years and more than $20 billion to complete.

Typical Cheeto. Just claim something is super easy to do and won't cost a dime. When reality sinks in (usually years later after spending billions) that it's going to be over 100 times more expensive than he thought and will take decades longer than he thought, just quietly stop working on it...

Next up: the golden dome 🤮

[–] AugustWest@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The Golden (Teapot) Dome

[–] MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca 3 points 23 hours ago

Womp womp ....

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Didn't Mexico pay for it?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

everything they talk about is bigger in texas.

[–] antisocialite@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

It was always a boondoggle and another grift.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

No self loving Mexican would ever cross that thing.... They would go around... Off in the distance, unseen.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

Thats one way to get ices 3000/d arrest quota

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›