this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
344 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

39123 readers
1074 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 47 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

lmao, their tourism is going to shrivel and die so fast

[–] Gen_Euffe@sh.itjust.works 34 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

The attendance for the next FIFA cup was already looking bad, and I can't imagine the US government wanting your history of online activity to help it even a bit.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 20 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I can't wait to see high attendance in Mexico and Canada-hosted matches, with rock bottom attendance in the US. Even US fans travelling domestically, don't go, especially to the states that are falling into line with Trump.

Not that it will actually be recognized for what it is. I may put together a bingo card on the ways media spins it.

[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago

I've been boycotting the world cup for a decade because they can't stop giving the host status to horrible states

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago

Yeah looking at the attendance for the world club competition is pretty bad.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

The last one was in some barbarian gulf state, now it's even worse. Fuck FIFA

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 15 hours ago

People should boycott it outright.

The entire event industry is a front for sex trafficking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago

It already is.. Many people from Europe I know, now cancelled their plans.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

in other news, the market price of hacked credentials for MAGA-friendly social media accounts:

📈

notein case it is unclear to anyone: the above is a joke.

in all seriousness, renaming someone else's account and presenting it to CBP as one's own would be dangerous and inadvisable. a more prudent course of action at this time is to avoid traveling to the united states.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

hey turns out our tech oligarchs are the ones spying on us and not the chinese, what a twist!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Libb@jlai.lu 31 points 16 hours ago

They want to stay by themselves? That's fine by me. But then they should also stop exporting their Hollywood and streaming turds (as well as their shit food). That would only be fair. And maybe also stop behaving like if they owned the entire planet?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 17 hours ago

Here officer my username is ifuckyourmum69

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 20 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lol I don't even remember most of my previous handles. If amnesia isn't a valid defense I'm never getting into the USA. Then again, I have no reason to visit shithole countries in the first place.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 16 hours ago

Nobody can and that will be use to prove that you lie on the form if they need to find something on you in the future.

[–] taco@piefed.social 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The username requirement isn't anything new; that requirement was on our DS-160 years ago.

The "wants people to set their social media profiles to public" isn't quoted, so seems less like an official policy anywhere and more like one embassy worker being a prick. Unfortunately, each individual embassy operates independently totally devoid of any accountability.

This process is dehumanizing, inefficient, and totally fucked...but this particular part of it has been this was for a long-ass time.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] taco@piefed.social 4 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Fair enough, though that's an ask from the State Dept., not a demand from the embassy, as indicated in the OP. It's an important distinction because the embassy holds the authority at that point in the process. They can ignore the guidance altogether or demand everyone open their profiles. They're probably more likely to do the latter now, but they could've done this two years ago too.

Demanding the usernames for the past 5 years and being suspect of anyone not on social media isn't a new, that was my main point. I don't think many people appreciated how shitfucked our visa processes are, even before the current "administration" helping.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I can wait for @SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to share those moths post for his embassy appointment

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Also the only way I can be stopped from posting moth

Guess I'm never entering the US. 😭😭

(Pretty damn lucky if you ask me)

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 10 points 16 hours ago

Holy crap. How is this even real?

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 16 hours ago

Going there with a crappy handwritten letter including all 40’000 throw-away users I ever created

/s

[–] Ushmel@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Oh no, I might have to lie to the government

[–] lath@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

I barely remember this username and I'm looking at it every time I post something.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a Small Government Republican and I FULLY support this FREEDOM! If you WANT to Come into our Country you have to RESPECT OUR CONSTITUTION (which means you ARE allowed to Shoot Up a School but THATS IT!)!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

How many schools are allowed per person?

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago

There is no limit to freedom!

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AnotherUsername@lemmy.ml 3 points 15 hours ago

Oh look, fake social media accounts used. Fantastic. No gaps here!

[–] far_university1990@reddthat.com 2 points 15 hours ago (3 children)
  1. Post trump positive stuff, maybe edit old content to include.
  2. Post prompt inject to label account america positive, hide in spoiler block, image alt text, etc.
  3. Post eyeblech content so checker use ai or only get content overview. Will either prompt inject or mostly see trump positive post.

Or create fake profile with trump positive post, but no history probably suspicious.

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago

Or even buy a fake age profile…that is going to be a business

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›