this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
39 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

39448 readers
363 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago

If everything got updated like this, then that's an awesome change. What made Aero so nice was that it didn't interfere with legibility, while Glass threw legibility out the window. Striving for a proper foreground to background contrast ratio should be the bare minimim for a company like Apple, and this improves that significantly.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As long as it's an option that's okay. We quite like the look of the original somewhat so as long as we can have that version and make adjustments as necessary then it's okay.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Options? Apple? Seems unlikely...

[–] unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't get the downvotes, Apple is religious about avoiding configuration where not absolutely required.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

I joke. Apple has gotten a lot better about giving options in recent years.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What is ios 26? I thought we were on ios18??

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should have just called it appleOS 26 since they are bumping all of it to 26 and unifying the look and feel between all of their OSs.

[–] StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the explanation for 26 is that it's the version for 2026. Seems like a good choice when settling on a common number for all the operating systems. Similar to MY26 in cars etc.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Date-based versioning sounds great in theory, but if you have more than one version in support at once then it can get ugly quickly

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Say you released version 2023, 2024, and 2025, all of which are in support at the same time. It's 2025, but your latest release might be 2023.2, which looks like it's out of date to a user.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, I get you.

[–] unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apple bumps the version number for everything every year nowadays, so not a problem for them.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do they do about devices that are still getting minor updates or fixes but not new major versions?

[–] tangentism@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago

At the mo, it would be something like macOS 15.5.1, iOS 18.2.2, etc

It will just move to year. major point update. minor point update so for example: 26.5.2