this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
150 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

3607 readers
73 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Knock knock, Nintendo.

Suprise!

Its the Consumer Protection and Defense agency of Brazil!

https://www.dexerto.com/gaming/nintendo-faces-legal-action-over-ability-to-brick-switch-2s-whenever-they-want-3221145/

Yeah, Brazil is evidently not cool with the 'we can completely brick your device remotely' schtick.

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yep. And unlike most toothless consumer protection agencies in the US, Procon does not fuck around. They'll even straight up force gaming companies to unban someone from a game if the person felt the ban was unfair, and force them to not only return their entire progress, but all of their items and pay them a sum for the damages. Add that to the fact suing in Brazil is completely different than in the US: everyone is assigned a lawyer for absolutely free during the entire process, and customers win cases against big companies all the time without ever having to spend a single cent.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

I guess if the German "verbraucherschutz" hears this they might also pitch in once the German bureaucracy has run a few months for it

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 55 points 4 days ago

Everything about Switch 2 has made me hate every choice Nintendo has made.

Guess I'll sit out this generation, and focus on backlogs. Then in 10 years, I can always just pirate the Switch 2 catalog.

[–] noride@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I read about Nintendo's ability effectively brick them remotely yesterday and decided to cancel my order. I have had every Nintendo console since the NES, for better or worse, but I am definitely skipping this one.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The steam deck has been the direct replacement for the Nintendo switch for me.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I swear man there needs to be a big fan push nintendo to have some form of official pc ports

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know 'canceled' is the American spelling but it looks weird to me without the second L.

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh my god, it does have two L's. I've been losing my mind this entire time for like the past... Well since getting auto correct.

I thought I was just bad at spelling.

[–] LilB0kChoy@midwest.social 10 points 3 days ago

Both "canceled" and "cancelled" are correct spellings, but they are used in different regions. "Canceled" is the preferred spelling in American English, while "cancelled" is preferred in British English.

For whatever reason, even though I'm American, canceled just looks wrong to me.

[–] masterbaexunn@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Just wait til it's hacked bro. No way they are keeping this thing secure.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if the EU can throw the book at them. Technically the port on the switch is not USB-C but a proprietary port with the same physical connector. But EU mandates USB-C especially so people can use chargers and things they already have. So I wonder if Switch 2 violates EU regulations.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it mandates it for charging, but i dont think the mandate technically applies for other functionality.

i wouldnt be surprised if as a device it charges normally with pd chargers.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The original Switch didn't confirm to USB-PD properly, I doubt the second one does.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

EU law that mandated all devices under 100W to adhere to the USB-PD protocol only passed a few years ago. Comparing it to the switch 1 is invalid because it was designed before the mandate existed. I made my statement with knowledge of the mandate

if you want to doubt nintendo didn't follow it, nintendo is effectively illegally selling the switch 2

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can't believe they did it again.
While on the Switch 1 it might have been because the USB PD spec wasn't fully finalized when it was made, on the 2 they're being actively malicious.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can't believe they did it again.

I mean, really?

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 days ago

I guess I should say I'm impressed at their audacity instead of suprised...

Just another example of Nintendo sucking.

I’m so glad I didn’t buy this piece of shit. Keep your junk, Nintendo. I’ll enjoy your games on PC when emulation comes.

Which is funny because I would have been a paying customer. But now I don’t have to!

[–] hakase@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Everyone who actually buys a Switch 2 deserves exactly what they get.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

You're not wrong, though we should still advocate for consumer protections to stop this abuse.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

Nintendoesn't

[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago