Sometimes it's a good sign, at least in politics. The 99-1 Senate vote to kill the anti-AI-law ban of the latest bill was telling. Same goes for unanimous SCOTUS decisions. If both liberals and conservatives overwhelmingly agree on a thing, it's almost certainly a good call.
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
53 points (83.5% liked)
Showerthoughts
35757 readers
2006 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.
Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:
- Both “200” and “160” are 2 minutes in microwave math
- When you’re a kid, you don’t realize you’re also watching your mom and dad grow up.
- More dreams have been destroyed by alarm clocks than anything else
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- No politics
- If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
- A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS
If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.
Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The patriot act. The Iraq war.
I remember going voting with my parents in the 80's in communist Poland. Voting was mandatory, so you would get into trouble if you wouldn't go. It also wasn't private, so you basically had to show what you voted for before putting your ballot into the ballot box. On top of they there was only one party which you could vote for.
So practically a ritual. What's the point of voting if there is only one candidate? Rhetorical question
To say you have elections.
The point is to pretend to the world that you are a democracy.
There are multiple candidates, but if elections are held in a one party state, they all belong to the same party or a party that is effectively under the dominating party's control.
Is purple cosmos the Polish national flower?
No, I don't think so.
Hmm. I heard you've got a lot of them tho
While I agree with your scepticism initially, I worry that this is something a right wing lunatic would posture about Democrats.
That's troubling logic.
to be entirely honest a world without Nazis would concern me, specifically because of the question "where did they go?"
I think that nazi is an expression of trauma, given form by propaganda.
Take away the trauma and nazi disappears.
Take away the propaganda and you get, I dunno, less organized bad behavior.
It makes me want to leave.
vote with your feet.
I've been traveling for about fifteen years now, if you have any questions.
Sounds like you'd make a good AMA post
