this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
243 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

72577 readers
4282 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Phone makers need to add LoRa radios to phones. Something like this would be more useful then.

[–] icegladiator@lemy.lol 2 points 6 hours ago

We already have Briar. I don't get why Jack Dorsey is trying to get into the messaging space so hard. He also bankrolls SimpleX Chat if anyone is familiar with that platform

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

For all those little bitches.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

don't nazis already have telegram

[–] Pro@programming.dev 6 points 12 hours ago

Now they have a second option.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Ingenious name. I feel like Bitchat should be connected somehow with PenIsland.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

If you want to bitch at someone, there's an app for that

[–] lemonuri@infosec.pub 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

There is already a really good foss app that does exactly that, it's called briar and is as secure and private as it gets. The downside with p2p communication apps being, that they eat your phones battery for breakfast. Still a good option for activists or journalists I think. It's a good way to get around the "server in the middle" problem. Still more convenient to run your own (xmpp) server at home imho...

[–] hietsu@sopuli.xyz 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

** for Android (and Windows/macOS/Linux) but not iOS.

And apparently never going to be as some key component is written in Java. Other technical obstacles should be solvable (like f.ex. getting continuous running in bg by exploiting location services like iSH can do)

[–] lemonuri@infosec.pub 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Thanks, I did not realise that. So this app is for Mac to Mac communication only. If seems for briar you need to run a server still or messages will get lost between mobile users. How does this new app solve that problem? On mobile phones disconnects will happen regularly as network coverage changes and different network towers connect and disconnect when you are on the move. You might as well spin up your own xmpp server at that point, as that protocol is tried and tested for over 20 years and very lightweight and battery friendly as well...

[–] Mniot@programming.dev 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I once did some programming on the Cybiko, a device from 2000 that could form a wireless mesh network with peers. The idea was that you could have a shopping mall full of teens and they'd be able to chat with each other from one end to the other by routing through the mesh. It was a neat device!

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

I wanted a cybiko so bad as a teen. It seemed like it would be so cool if everyone I knew bought one. Of course no one did, but I still think they are awesome.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 28 points 19 hours ago
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Have a look at meshtastic. Yes, you do have to get a separate device, but range on it can be several tens to hundreds of miles depending on the mesh density.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Yeah my first thought when I read the headline was "why not just use meshtastic?"

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 17 hours ago

In practice range seems to be a few kilometers, in places with lots of nodes.

[–] zapzap 20 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

If you're in Bluetooth range can't you chat with your mouths? Or is it for secretly chatting when you're in a group of people? I don't get the use case.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 9 points 11 hours ago

It's not about you being in bluetooth range of the person you want to talk to, it's about all the people sitting in between you both that pass the message along without touching the internet.

So you can be on a cargo ship, or on a remote island, with 20 other people and all use chat. If 1 person has internet, then you can all chat globally as well.

It's the same basic method of how airtags work. Everyone with an iPhone connects to the airtag and passes data to Apple. It's just done in the background, so users don't ever notice.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 6 points 19 hours ago

Could be useful on a plane: If you have different seats than someone and don't want to pay for your airline's ridiculous data prices. Although, most airlines I fly on(american, delta, air canada, united) all have free RCS/Facebook/Whatsapp, but not necessarily Signal, Telegram, Matrix, or your preferred secure service.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 22 hours ago

Bluetooth ranges are quite large now.

But an example even if someone is a foot away would be a concert or event where it's to loud.

[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago

I have no idea if this is correct. But imagine if you have a setup like Apple’s AirTag. Except when you receive a signal (message) you also relay it to whoever’s path you cross for the next X amount of time. The more people using the app the bigger the mesh network gets.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The best app to Bitch At things.

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Neat idea 10 years ago "discovered" recently by a tech bro who thinks he's the first one to think of it. He got his clicks, I guess.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago

No one has got it right yet though. Being apple only, he hasn’t either.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] percent@infosec.pub 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Aside from the fact that he made twitter (which I blame in large part for how our political/news media landscape, as well as modern discourse, has become so thoughtless), left and made blue sky, then left blue sky and endorsed twitter?

The dude supports a ton of toxic shit and can get entirely fucked.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 43 minutes ago

Lol he endorsed Twitter after leaving Bluesky? That's an interesting series of events.

Yeah I think Twitter has been a net negative for society.

[–] mahi@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

I'm happy to see a niche decentralized thing from Jack more than if it was another commercial start-up. And I have nothing against yet another bluetooth chat. But I'm not impressed. In the whitepaper nothing is written about spam protection, so it wouldn't work as a reliable P2P app at scale. And the UI... It's mere a toy for Jack's personal nostalgia about "the good old times". And nostalgia driven development doesn't work in general, I would say.

Seems rehashed, with more enshittification likely to be baked in. Typical tech bros.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 74 points 1 day ago

Bitch At

Lmao

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 99 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

I read it like that first and thought it was one of these illegal apps to track your partner without them knowing.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›